Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta police act 1866 Sorted by: recent Court: himachal pradesh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc shimla Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.034 seconds)

Dec 15 2011 (TRI)

Tara Mandal Minks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Icici Bank Ltd. and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

Decided on : Dec-15-2011

..... the opposite, parties but of no avail. 5. hence deficiency of service have been alleged on the part of the opposite parties and complaint under section 12 of consumer protection act, 1986 has been filed wherein directions have been sought against the opposite parties for return the vehicle and to pay compensation on account of harass ment, inconvenience and loss of ..... order of fora below and he has also raised the plea that the complainant does not fall within the ambit of consumer under section 2(1)(d) of consumer protection act, 1986, as the vehicle was purchased for commercial pur pose. mr. rajesh verma, advocate had also supported the order of fora below. 14. after hearing learned counsel for the parties ..... in the argu ments of mr. vijay verma, learned, counsel for the respondent that complainant does not fall within the ambit of definition of con sumer under the consumer protection act, 1986, since there is no iota of evidence on record to prove this plea. 16. no other point was urged. 17. in view of the aforesaid discussion and fact and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2011 (TRI)

H.P. State Electricity Board and Another Vs. Vishwas Sharma and Anothe ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Shimla

Decided on : Sep-29-2011

..... it was held that neither the court nor any tribunal has the competence to issue a direction contrary to law nor it can direct an authority to act in contravention of statutory provisions. in view of the aforesaid discussion and facts and circumstances of the case, present revision petition is allowed and the order ..... and as per him the complainant thus falls within the ambit of definition of ??consumer under section 2 (1)(d) of the consumer protection act, 1986 being a beneficiary and this fact is also evident from the statement of account annexed by him with the reply to the objections to ..... parties and even no photographs were taken in the presence of the respondent and as such it is alleged that the local commissioner has not acted fairly and tried to help respondent no.1 which is apparent from the fact that statements of two witnesses, tek chand thakur and hardeep singh ..... service had been alleged on the part of opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 and as such present complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 was filed against the opposite parties wherein prayer had been made for directing the opposite parties jointly and severally to:- restore the illegally disconnected ..... connection provided in shop no.2 of sheela bhawan, lihantoo building, near bus stand, sanjau, shimla, and is a consumer under the consumer protection act, 1986 and opposite party no.3 is the landlord of the premises where the complainant is running his business of ready-made garments for the last .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //