Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta police act 1866 Sorted by: recent Court: kerala state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc thiruvananthapuram Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.025 seconds)

Nov 04 2011 (TRI)

Adv. T. Joseph Chairman, Rural Development Centre Vs. the Secretary, K ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Nov-04-2011

..... to pay this amount from his own pocket. there is no doubt that it is unfair trade practice and deficiency in service as per the provisions of the consumer protection act. the complainant is only liable to pay rs. 9,240 + rs. 3,85 = (total amount 9,625/-) the opposite parties have no right to collect rs. 27,098/-. as per ..... . b1 and b2 documents. the counsel for the opposite parties submitted that the assessment was done by the opposite parties as per the section 126(5) (6) of electricity amendment act 2007 an assessment at the rate equal to two times the tariff applicable for a period of 12 months immediately proceeding the date of inspection must be imposed. the counsel ..... equal to 2 times with tariff applicable for a period of 12 months immediately proceeding the date of inspection much imposed, as per section 126 (5) (6) of electricity amendment act, 2007. the fora taken a view that the assessment of the opposite party is correct, hence the impugned bill issued by them is also upheld by the forum below. 6 ..... .27,908/- has been issued out of previous enmity is false. on 18.9.09 , a surprise inspection was conducted by the authorized office under section 126 of the electricity act and it is found that consumer no. 7764 has an unauthorized load of 7kw and a mahazer was prepared and copy of the same was given to the employees present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2011 (TRI)

Life Insurance Corporation of India Branch Office, Town Hall Road, Thr ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Jul-28-2011

..... murder but is a murder simplicitor. since the police reports, and the nature of the killing by stopping a vehicle, dragging out the victim by a number of persons indicate nothing but a murder ..... vadakkathara ward committee and the above said murdered reji was a citu worker and both were rivals and belonged to rival political parties. from the police records, it can be seen that the dominant intention was to kill the life assured. such killing is a premeditated murder and not an accidental ..... request of the opposite party to submit necessary forms for consideration the claim. the complainant was provided with police records and reports in crime no. 303/2005 of viyyur police station and from the police reports, it was clearly revealed that the life assured was murdered in relation with the murder of another ..... inconnection with the recovery of the weapon under sec. 27 of the evidence act, or if any other circumstantial evidence already collected by the police. on the basis of this investigation of the murder case of the insured person. the police investigation team prepared the ext. r5 charge sheet. it is on the ..... basis of mere available data in their case diary. all of this evidence are became an evidence as per the evidence act only if it will be proved through the criminal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2011 (TRI)

K.K. Zacharia and Another Vs. the Station Manager, Royal Jordanian and ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Apr-12-2011

..... essential medicines etc. worth more than rs. 1.25 lakhs. the same contained many valuable gift articles also. the loss was immediately reported at the nearest police out post since the ground handling agency m/s. egypt air was found closed. the complainants had to buy the dress materials and other articles afresh. alleging ..... air foundations are operating through out the day in the airport. the complainants have not produced any record as to the complaint alleged by filed before the police. in the absence of the pir the opposite parties had difficulties to arrange for tracing of the missing baggage. the baggage tab was also not handed ..... not disclosed to the opposite parties. they have not made any declaration as to the contents of the baggage vide the provisions in the carriage by air act, 1972. the contention that the baggage contained articles worth more than rs. 1.25 lakhs is disputed. the offer to pay 400 u.s. dollars ..... for quite a long time. also stands not discredited in the cross examination of pw1. it is their case that the police authorities in the nearest station and was not able to understand english and with the help of another person the complainants somehow registered the complaint. the ..... police authorities shouted at them when they asked for acknowledgment and then they left the place. we find that there is nothing to dis .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 2011 (TRI)

Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co.Ltd. and Others Vs. Sm ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Dec-28-2011

justice sri. k.r. udayabhanu : president the appellants are the opposite parties 1 to 3/bajaj allianz life insurance co. in cc.nos.167/09 and 168/09 in the file of cdrf, pathanamthitta. the appellants are under orders to refund a sum of rs.4,50,000/- each to the complainants in the respective ccs and to pay a compensation of rs.15000/- and cost of rs.5000/- with interest at 10% from the date of order. the complainants are the wife(cc.167/09) and the husband(cc.168/09) in the respective complaints. 2. it is the case that they had joined in the life insurance policy under unit plus scheme of the opposite parties/appellants. the total premium was rs.4,50,000/-, to be paid in 3 yearly payments at the rate of rs.1,50,000/- each. the 4th opposite party/field officer of the insurance company used to collected the premium of cheques and issue receipts. accordingly the cheques were issued in the name of the 4th opposite party and 4th opposite party used to remit the premium and the company used to issue receipts. receipts for rs.1,50,000/- each in the name of the complainants dated 18.8.07 were issued by the pthanamthitta branch of the insurance company. the original policy bond was surrendered for complete withdrawal of the assured sum in the month of june 2009. the request was acknowledged by mr.dileep.r.panicker, asst.branch supervisor. subsequently on 22.7.09 duplicate copy of the policy documents were returned with an endorsement that the original policy bond was not received. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2011 (TRI)

Pathanamthitta District Co-operative Bank, Rep. by Its General Manager ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Dec-14-2011

..... opposite party made the complaint believe that insurance covering an amount of rs. 1,00,000/- would be taken by the second opposite party and it is evident from the act of the opposite party in taking insurance policy after the theft had taken place. contending that the order is only to be upheld, the learned counsel argued for the dismissal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2011 (TRI)

P.K. Joshy, Proprietor, Namakkad Chit Fund Vs. K.S. Madhusoodanan and ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Nov-30-2011

..... appellate stage also. but, the aforesaid contention adopted in the present appeal memorandum cannot be upheld because of the fact that the prize chits and money circulation scheme (banning) act has no application in the state of jammu and kashmir where the subject chit was registered and commenced. hence this point is found against the appellant in the above appeals ..... commenced from the jammu branch of the opposite party. if that be so, the aforesaid chit is not prohibited by the provisions of prize chits and money circulation scheme (banning) act. 11. ext.b1 thalavaryola would make ti clear that part of the aforesaid chit transaction had taken place within the jurisdiction of cdrf, ernakulam. so, the complainants as subscribers ..... orally requesting for extension of time and that the complainant as subscribers to the said chit waited for getting the chit amounts without invoking the provisions of the consumer protection act, 1986. the forum below considered the entire aspects of the case regarding maintainability of those complaints and rightly passed the common order dated:10th february 2006 allowing the petitions ..... filed without impleading namakkad chit funds as a party to the chit transaction is not maintainable; that the chit business does not come within the purview of the consumer protection act and so the consumer forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaints. thus, the opposite party prayed for dismissal of the aforesaid complaints. 3. the opposite party had also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2011 (TRI)

The Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. B.A. Abdulla Kunhi and An ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Nov-26-2011

..... time and the opposite parties advised him to wait till the police complete the investigation and that the claim will be considered only after 6 months from the date of loss of the vehicle. hence the complainant approached ..... insurer has denied the allegation of the complainant that the entire incident was intimated in time and that they advised to wait till completion of the police investigation. it is also denied that they refused to provide the claim form. the claim form was given to him on 2.3.09. the ..... it was found that the 2nd opposite party has absconded and the residence is seen closed. he filed a complaint before the jfcm, kasargode. the kasargode police have registered the case under section 406 ipc vide crime no.526/08. it is stated that he informed the insurance co. about the incident in ..... the insurer against loss or damage of the vehicle by burglary, house breaking or theft etc. and by malicious act vide section 1(vii) of policy. evidently the act that involved comes within the amplitude of ??malicious act ? . hence the above contention of the appellant is liable to be rejected . it is seen from ext ..... or damage of the vehicle by burglary, house breaking or theft, by accidental external means and by malicious acts etc. the action of 2nd opposite party in the instant case is nothing but a malicious act and hence it was held that the opposite parties are liable to indemnify the complainant. 6. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2011 (TRI)

Sheela and Others Vs. Lic of India, Rep. by the Zonal Manager and Othe ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Nov-24-2011

..... is not vested with such authority to mis represent facts (mrs. maniluxmi patel vs. hindustan corporative insurance society ltd. and another a. i. r 1962 , calcutta , 625). 21. the contention that the deceased before admitted into the policy had undergone medical examinations and the doctor of the l.i.c. have certified that ..... recommending lives for insurance. in the letter issued by the divisional manager dtd. 20.1.2005, it has been held that the development officer has acted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the corporation. it is pointed out that he should have made all reasonable enquiries with regard to the ..... accepting the proposal. 7. the l.i.c. is entitled to repudiate the claim and declare the policy void as per section 45 of the insurance act, 1932. the complainant had taken up the matter with divisional manager, chennai and the matter was considered by the claim review committee consisting of a retired ..... caused to him on 6.3.2002. the assured died by drowning due to an accident. 3. the complainants are in very poor circumstances. the act of the opposite parties repudiating the claim is illegal. it is further alleged that the opposite parties 5 and 6/development officer and agent respectively are the ..... in the form for joining in the policy. the 6th opposite party/agent was fully aware of the above fact. he brought a proposal form and acting as the agent of the l.i.c. enquired and collected the details and asked the deceased to put his signatures where ??x marks are put .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2011 (TRI)

The Area Service Manager, Tata Motors Ltd., Area Service, Office and A ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Oct-20-2011

..... the expression consumer who buys goods for purposes of their being used in any activity engaged on a large scale for the purpose of making profit. the benefits of the act is intended to be denied only to persons purchasing goods either for purpose of resale or for being used in any activity engaged on a large scale for the purpose ..... a person has bought goods is to be treated as a commercial purpose within the meaning of the definition of the expression ??consumer ? in sec.2(1)(d) of the act is always the question of fact to be decided in the facts and circumstances of each case. the supreme court has quoted therein the earlier decisions of the national commission ..... terms of the warranty. it is also mentioned that the opposite party does not admit that the complainant is a consumer as defined under section 2(1)(d) of the act and that the complainant is to be put to strict proof of the same and that in the absence of materials to establish the same the petition is liable to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2011 (TRI)

Dr. Sunil Kumar, Indira Dandhi Co-operative Hospital Vs. P. Mohanan an ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Decided on : Sep-26-2011

..... analysis report. it is to be noted that 3rd opposite party recommended for further investigations for confirming the aforesaid report. the appellant/1st opposite party doctor was not expected to act upon ext.b1 report suggesting a diagnosis of lymphoma or leukemia. b1 report suggested for other confirmatory tests/examinations. appellant/1st opposite party before conducting such confirmatory tests made a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //