Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on : Apr-11-2011
..... to verify the facts that the alleged sellers are genuine and their photographs are also affixed in the registered sale deed . he further submits that the police failed to locate the actual culprits whose photographs are affixed in the registered sale deed who had cheated the complainant as well as the petitioners. he further ..... him that not only his land but also lands belonging to his family members of various khasras about 26.50 hectares land has been sold. on this report police kotwali seoni registered crime no.389/2010 and lodged fir for the offence punishable u/s 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120-b/34 of ..... filed by the petitioners to invoke the extra ordinary powers of this court to quash first information report ( fir) in connection with crime no.389/2010 registered at police station- kotwali seoni, district- seoni for alleged offence under sections 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120-b/34 of ipc and also the subsequent proceedings. ..... p.l.j. short note (18) at page 11 wherein it has been said that bonafide purchaser is a good witness. the prosecution has duty to act carefully and not to side with one party or the other. it is abuse of process of the court of magistrate as it amounted to negative the ..... complainant laxman singh sirvaiya by registered sale-deed in the month of february 2010.(3) in brief, the case of the police is that one laxman singh sirvaiya lodged a report at police station kotwali seoni, district seoni on 19.7.2010 (16.7.2010) that he is owner and in possession of whole .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-23-2011
..... a superior officer committed a procedural irregularity in directing the petitioner verbally to move to base hospital-iii and escort back the 2 deserting police constables after securing their discharge from the hospital. but the fact of the matter would remain that the petitioner did visit the hospital ..... authorities and were handed over their medical documents. that on their way out they saw the petitioner along with crpf personnel and civil police surrounding the hospital. in the meantime dr.chaudhry came and took back their medical documents on the pretext of correcting some mistakes. when ..... detachment headquarter requiring the 4 constables, which included ct.raj pal and ct.yoginder singh, to be produced or handed over to the local police. 3. evidenced from the charge, it is the case of the respondents that the petitioner, working as a deputy commandant, was detailed ..... ct.raj pal and ct.yogender singh assaulted the coy commander and ransacked the police station morigaon, assam. taking cognizance of the incident the 4 constables were suspended. pertaining to the acts of arson at the police station, inasmuch public property was destroyed, an fir was registered at ps morigaon ..... and the local police was on the lookout for the 4 constables to interrogate them. deserting the camp .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-26-2011
..... company had a branch office was held not maintainable. where the plaintiff instituted a suit at kozhikode alleging that its account with the defendant bank at its calcutta branch had been wrongly debited and it was claimed that the court had jurisdiction as the defendant had a branch there, it was held that the existence ..... amritsar and is liable to be sued at amritsar. similarly a life assurance company which carries on business in bombay and employs an agent at madras who acts merely as a post office forwarding proposals and sending moneys cannot be said to do business in madras. where a contract of insurance was made at place ..... in the name of a.b. & co., which employs upon the usual terms a bombay firm carrying on business in the name of c.d. & co., to act as the english firm's commission agents in bombay, does not 'carry on business' in bombay so as to render itself liable to be sued in bombay. (2 ..... terminating the services of the plaintiffs. the termination admittedly never took place at delhi. 9. appellant no.1 says that defendant no.3 and 4 were acting as the agent of defendant no.1 and 2 and thus it can be said that said defendants i.e. no.1 and 2 were carrying on ..... . 2 were carrying any business or activity from delhi. qua defendant no.3 and 4, the learned single judge noted that said defendants were placement agencies acting as independent agents to recommend persons required by defendant no.1 and 2 and such other clients of defendants no.3 and 4 who sought their service. 8 .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Feb-15-2011
..... where the allegations in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying, the fir do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under section 156(1) of the code except under an order of a magistrate within the purview of section 155(2) of the code. (3 ..... ) where, the allegations in the fir do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a magistrate as contemplated under section 155(2) of the code. (5) where the allegations made in the fir or ..... of fraudulent documents and for making false statement.4. on such a complaint dated 25.3.2010 given by the second respondent, the inspector of police, central crime branch, chennai suburban, st. thomas mount has registered a case in cr.no.41 of 2010 for the offence punishable under secs ..... against the accused. (6) where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code or the concerned act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the ..... code or the concerned act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party. (7) where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with malafide and/or where .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-08-2011
..... , assist all officers of the government in the execution of their public duties, supply, to the best of his ability any local information which those officers may require, and generally act for the landowners, tenants and residents of the estate or sub-division of the estate in which he holds office in their relations with government; (xi) report to the patwari .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-17-2011
..... columbia trading company limited. 2. a meeting of the shareholders of pushpanjali trexim limited shall be convened and held at 10, kiran shankar roy road, 1st floor, calcutta-700001 on the 29th day of april, 2011 at 2.30 p.m. for the purpose of considering and if thought fit approving with or without modification, the ..... the shareholders of columbia trading company limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company) shall be convened and held at 10, kiran shankar roy road, 1st floor, calcutta- 700001 on the 29th day of april, 2011 at 2.00 p.m. for the purpose of considering and if thought fit approving with or without modification, the ..... said meetings and stating that the copies of the said scheme together with the copy of the statement required to be sent under section 393 of the companies act, 1956 and the prescribed form of proxy can be obtained free of charge at the respective registered office of the applicant companies or at the office of ..... aforesaid together with a copy of the said scheme of amalgamation as also a copy of the statement required to be sent under section 393 of the companies act, 1956 and the prescribed form of proxy be served by registered post or by hand delivery to each of the shareholders of the applicant companies at their ..... of the meetings and their reports shall be verified by their respective affidavits. this application is disposed of. the chairpersons and all parties are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Jun-20-2011
..... affidavit was directed to be filed disclosing the sums that were paid by the petitioner allegedly from july, 1992 till october, 2000 before the rent controller, calcutta together with supporting documents. the affidavit was directed to be filed by april 4, 2011 and the application was directed to be listed on april 5, ..... in terms of the compromise decree dated november 25, 1991 and also to recover the rent allegedly deposited in the office of the rent controller, calcutta which have by now become lapsed deposits, this court discharges the petitioner and the opposite parties 2 and 3 from their undertakings and proceeds to ..... had been duly authorised to affirm the said affidavit on behalf of the petitioner. details of deposit of rent in the office of the rent controller, calcutta from july, 1992 till october, 2000 were disclosed. however, it was admitted that after october, 2000, no rent was paid to the opposite party ..... of the judgment debtors. 2. in connection with the execution case, the opposite party no.1 had instituted misc. case no.923 of 2006, seeking police help for execution of the decree. the petitioner and the opposite parties 2 and 3 were contesting the said misc. case by filing a written objection ..... of the petitioner, registered as misc. case no.237/2011. the petitioner also filed an application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the limitation act. 4. on march 14, 2011, an application for stay in connection with misc. case no.237 of 2011 was moved on behalf of the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-03-2011
..... in case of arrest of the petitioner for offences under section 435, 436, 147, 151 ipc and section 3 of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989, registered with police station, paonta sahib, district sirmaur. 2. the allegations are that an fir against one sumeet bhardwaj, who has been involved in murdering three persons, was lodged with the ..... government hospital, paonta sahib. at this stage, only mob violence concerning the involvement of the petitioner would be the material collected by the police in the investigation which is at the initial stage. the incident is one of rioting mob violence and communal clashes in which the petitioner herein is said to be involved ..... police station at paonta sahib. one of the deceased is said to be in relation of the petitioner and he accompanied the family members to get the dead bodies from the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Dec-09-2011
..... centrifuged latex and crumb rubber. 3. while so, the government, in exercise of the power conferred under section 10 of the kerala general sales tax act, 1963 (kgst act in short) issued ext.p2 notification bearing sro no.695/2003, finding it necessary in the public interest so to do and exempted the manufacturers ..... point of sale in the state by dealers coming under sub-clause (g) of clause i of sub section (2a) of section 5 of the kgst act, except on the turn over relating to goods received on consignment and/or branch transfer. later, by virtue of the subsequent notification dated 09.03.1993, ..... such, there is no chance for any unlawful enrichment of the petitioner. by virtue of the mandate under section 22 (2) (b) of the kgst act, there is a prohibition in collecting the purchase tax and if any such attempt is made, the petitioner is liable to pay penalty, under the relevant provisions ..... of india, which stipulates that, no tax shall be collected without the authority of law. so also, it is contended that section 10 of the kgst act, confers the power under the government, only to provide exemption or to reduce tax liability and as such, the notifications issued in exercise of the said ..... of centrifuged latex and crumb rubber from payment of tax under the kgst act, 1963 on the purchase turnover of rubber in any form used for the manufacture of centrifuged latex and crumb rubber. it was also stated that the .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jul-07-2011
..... the existing rules which permit deduction of sales return only within three months of sale, petitioner or other medical companies cannot get deduction of sales returns. kerala general sales tax act or the rules do not specifically provide any provision for refund or adjustment of tax paid in respect of sale of medicines which have lost potency at the hands of ..... government. in any case, the petitioner / manufacturer is free to take up the matter with the government for providing sufficient safeguard under the vat scheme which has replaced sales tax act and rules.Tag this Judgment!