Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Jan-18-1968
Reported in : AIR1969All165; 1969CriLJ450
..... of view and it was contended that it could not be relied upon on behalf of the state in proof of the citizenship of the applicant. under article 77(1) of the constitution of india all executive actions of the government of india shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the president and it was contended that even this order should ..... have been passed by the central government in the name of the president and as it was not, it is not a valid order for the determination of the citizenship of ..... , also defines 'central government' as meaning in relation to anything done or to be done after the commencement of the constitution, the president even according to this provision the authority given to the central government under rule 30 of the citizenship rules, 1956, is to be exercised by the president and when this authority is so exercised by him or by any ..... from the commencement of the act. that portion of sub-section (1) which connects the loss of citizenship of india to the date of acquisition of foreign citizenship refers to the acquisition of foreign citizenship subsequent to the commencement of the act, while the loss of citizenship of india with effect from the date of the commencement of the act relates to the acquisition of foreign .....Tag this Judgment!