Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Court: allahabad Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.016 seconds)

Jan 18 1971 (HC)

The State of U.P. Vs. Shamsul Huda

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-1971

Reported in : 1971CriLJ977

..... 'migration' and deals only with voluntary acquisition of citizenship of a foreign state before the constitution came into force. cases of voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship after the commencement of the constitution have to be dealt with by the government of india under the citizenship act, 1955.section 7(3)(iii) of the ..... it was held that the respondent was a foreigner and was a citizen of pakistan. under section 9(2) of the citizenship act, 1955 the said determination is final. in kulathil mammu v. state of kerala : 1966crilj1217 it had been held:article 9 does not ..... 7(5)(iii) of the foreigners order or violates any provision contained in the foreigners act h notice calling upon him to leave india shall precede before he is prosecuted for the same. the aforesaid decision of the learned single judge was confined to the facts of ..... foreigners order, 1948 reads as under:every foreigner to whom a permit is issued under sub-section (1) or sub-paragraph (2) shall, unless the period indicated in the permit is extended by the central government, depart from india ..... on 5-4-1963 that the respondent had entered into india on a pakistani passport dated 3-4-1963. he had thereafter obtained requisite permit which was to expire on 4-5-1963. the question concerning the citizenship of the respondent was determined by the central government when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 1971 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Mohammad Amin

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-26-1971

Reported in : 1972CriLJ556

..... section 237 of the code of criminal procedure. this principle is recognised under section 403 of the criminal procedure code and the same principle is embodied in article 20(2) of the constitution of india. the principle would not be applicable if the offence for which the accused is tried subsequently is a distinct offence based on a different set of facts. the earlier ..... the pendency of the previous case, but once that case has been decided, it was not open even to the central government to decide whether the respondent had renounced the citizenship of india and had become a national of pakistan. this reasoning of the learned sessions judge is devoid of any merits and cannot be accepted.10. on the basis of the ..... on record that the question of citizenship of the respondent was determined by the government of india under section 9(2) of the citizenship act and rule 30 of the citizenship rules by an order dated 20-9-1966. a copy of the aforesaid order was served on the respondent ..... of the foreigners act.2. the respondent, mohammad amin was sent up for trial on the allegations that he had voluntarily acquired the citizenship of pakistan and intentionally disobeyed the order of the state government to leave india within twenty-four hours and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 14 of the foreigners act.3. it is apparent from the evidence .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //