Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-04-2005
Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3745; 2005(4)ESC2489
..... . v. commercial tax officer and ors. air 1963 sc 1811, with reference to the provisions of article 5 to article 11 of the constitution of india read with the citizenship act, 1955, a distinction between nationality and citizenship and between natural persons, in contradistinction to legal juristic persons, covered by the definition of 'citizens' entitled to the benefit of the fundamental rights made available ..... competent to claim the protection of article 30(1) of the constitution, and on that account the privilege of establishing and maintaining educational institutions of its choice, must be ..... reproduce relevant portion of the paragraph 28 of the constitutional bench judgment of the hon'ble supreme court of india in the case of st. stephen's college v. university of delhi, : air1992sc1630 , wherein it has been held as follows :'prior to the commencement of the constitution of india, there was no settled concept of indian citizenship. this court, however, did reiterate that the minority .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Dec-09-2005
Reported in : 2006(1)AWC362
..... residential permit since 1994 she can make an application for grant of indian citizenship as a person married to a citizen of india or as a person of indian origin, provided she has completed seven years of stay in india.5. it appears to us that by the passage of time or upon ..... .3. at the time of hearing before this court, the court wanted to get further materials from the petitioner as well as govt. of india for the purpose of final disposal.4. the petitioner wanted to establish that she has two previous marriage which was ultimately terminated by talak. we ..... a governmental order was passed by the under secretary to the government of india ministry of home affairs/groh mantralaya saying that the petitioner obtained pakistani passport in 1994. by obtaining pakistani passport she preferred to renounce her indian citizenship voluntarily. therefore, the central government in exercise of the powers conferred on ..... the country vis-a-vis the petitioner. the government of india contended on the basis of their instruction dated 30th may,2005 that if the application is made through proper channel i.e. in terms of rules 7 and 9 of the citizenship rules, 1956 the purpose will be subserved. the application ..... will be made to the district collector who in turn forward the same to the state government for future transmission to the concerned ministry of government of india. at the same time in paragraph 3 .....Tag this Judgment!