Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-08-1960
Reported in : AIR1961AP105; 1961CriLJ356
..... to prohibit an advocate from appearing for the opposite party.9. shri rama rao further contends that inasmuch as the accused cannot be denied under article 22(1) of the constitution of india 'the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice' any order prohibiting him to appear for the accused would contravene a ..... court consisting of rajamannar, c. j. and venkatarama aiyar, j., observed that the right to plead and act on behalf of suitors in court is not a right flowing from citizenship.....it is not only a citizen who is entitled to be enrolled as an advocate of this court. even a foreigner, if he fulfils the prescribed qualifications and requirements can ..... constitutional guarantee conferred on an accused. this argument overlooks the fact that what is guaranteed is a legal practitioner of his choice who is not otherwise barred or disabled from appearing .....Tag this Judgment!