Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-19-2009
Reported in : AIR2009Mad127; (2009)2MLJ396
..... as to why such ban order is imposed on him and it need not give any opportunity or notice to the foreign national. the constitution of india does not contain any provision obliging the central government to issue notice affording an opportunity. the right to life guaranteed under article 21 which ..... came to be passed in violation of principles of natural justice and the same further violates articles 14, 19, 21 and 22 of the constitution of india.iii. the impugned order is a non-speaking order which does not assign any reason much less a proper reason for restricting the entry ..... concerned had served a notice before passing impugned order, the petitioners could have produced some relevant materials in support of their claim of acquisition of citizenship, which they failed to do in the absence of a notice.18. ofcourse, no reference has been made about the international covenant 1966 in ..... . 03tf 750 95. most of his relatives and family members reside in india. he has got a valid multiple entry ..... orders. nagamuthu, j.1. the petitioner is a citizen of india residing at madras. his brother by name mr. rajiah john premkumar was born and brought up in india. later, he acquired citizenship of france and admittedly, he is no more a citizen of india. he resides in france. he holds french passport bearing no .....Tag this Judgment!