Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Mar-10-2004
..... not produced anything to prove their citizenship of india even in the writ proceeding. this naturally casts a serious doubt regarding the ..... petitioners have got remedy under the provisions of the customs act, 1962 itself. it will be a wise discretion not to exercise the power under article 226 of the constitution of india so as to interfere with the confiscation proceedings, which culminated to the aforesaid final adjudication orders. there is also no challenge to the same. the petitioners even after ..... veracity of the statement that the petitioners belong to mizoram, india and that they did not receive any notice relating ..... mentioning anything as to whether they have acquired indian citizenship. this is precisely the reason as to why there is no statement in the writ petition to the effect that the petitioners are citizens of india which statement is normally made in a writ petition. they have only referred to the constitution of india for protection of life and property. they have also .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jan-22-2004
..... time of her entry into service. it is also contended by the state-respondents that in the absence of any documentary evidence, such as admit card of school final examination, citizenship certificate, etc., produced on behalf of the petitioner, her claim that her date of birth is 17.1.1945 could not be accepted. it was under such circumstances that her ..... dated 13.3.2003, the respondent no. 2 required the petitioner to submit an attested photo copy of admit card for school final examination along with photo copy of the citizenship certificate issued by the competent authority. the petitioner, accordingly, made the reply to the aforesaid letter with a copy endorsed to the respondent 3 in which she had referred to ..... seniority list, her educational qualification and date of birth were entered as school final and 17.1.1943 respectively for which she had failed to produce the admit card or citizenship certificate and also made no objection regarding date of birth published in the final seniority list, and accordingly decided that the petitioner's actual date of birth is 17.1 ..... t. vaiphei, j.1. by this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner seeks to quash the impugned memo no. f.3(3736)-dswe/ estt/ 2003 dated 29.8.2003 and to direct the respondents to declare that her date of .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Mar-30-2004
..... the petitioner was born in assam in the year 1979 does not entitle him to be declared as a permanent resident of assam. this is not a case of obtaining citizenship by birth. in this case, we find that the respondent authorities had taken required steps in accordance with the principles of natural justice and after making necessary verification and enquiry ..... through the deputy commissioner, bongaigaon cancelled the candidature of the petitioner and there is absolutely no illegality or infirmity in the above order. after reservation of certain seats for all india quotas, the balance seats are reserved for the permanent residents of assam and there cannot be any dilution to that. the petitioner being a non-resident of assam, could have ..... applied under the all india quota on merit but he cannot be allowed to enter through back door by obtaining prc on the ground of his uncle's residency.6. in view of what has .....Tag this Judgment!