Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Court: mumbai Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.015 seconds)

Apr 20 1960 (HC)

The State of Bombay Vs. Dr. Raghunath Balkrishna Chandrachud

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-20-1960

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR442

..... april 30, 1949, although it was mentioned that a municipal court had no jurisdiction to interpret or enforce the merger agreement between two sovereign powers under article 363 of the constitution of india,57. in sir anthony musgrave v. jose ignacio pulido (1879) 5 a.c. 102 , their lordships of the privy council observed (p. 107) :it is enough here to say ..... describes the integration of states as follows (part v, pp. 33, 30) :the accession of the indian states to the dominion of india was the first phase of the process of fitting them into the constitutional structure of india, the second phase which rapidly followed, involved a process of two-fold integration, the consolidation of states into sizeable administrative units, and their ..... residents of those territories as subjects of that sovereign. in other words, as regards the residents of territories which come under the dominion of a new sovereign, the right of citizenship commences when the act of state terminates and the two, therefore, cannot co-exist.it follows from this that no act done or declaration made by the new sovereign prior ..... and execution of public affairs.. .perhaps it would be better to say that it is a legislative function to make all substantive law, and a judicial function finally to determine constitutional jurisdiction and the application of substantive law to specific facts...the legislative function, then, is general and relates to the future, whereas the judicial function is specific, final, and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //