Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Court: rajasthan Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.017 seconds)

Dec 01 1960 (HC)

inder Lall Yugal Kishore Vs. Lal Singh Mukund Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-01-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Raj122

..... candidature of the respondent no. 2; but the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the allegations made in the petition constitute statements of fact which are false statements made in relation to the personal character or conduct of the maharawal of dungarpur. there is of ..... for consideration is whether the documents in question fall within the purview of section 123, clause (4) of the act, so that their publication may constitute corrupt practice under the act. as we have said the contents of the documents are identical. we may, therefore, reproduce the relevant portions thereof to ..... an indian national, whether the passport is legal evidence or not cannot lead to any irresistible inference that the said person had voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign state; for such a passport could also be issued to a citizen by birth or descent. that being so, we find ..... have been married there to lal mohammed and returned with him under a pakistani passport to india. lal mohammed is admittedly an indian national residing in india. it appears that later kulsum obtained a certificate of indian citizenship; but on the day when the general elections took place she had not obtained any ..... whether living or dead or nonexistent, or whose names appeared in the same ward for two different houses or persons who were not citizens of india but whose names all the same appeared in the electoral rolls; or even in name of fictitious persons. secondly, it was alleged that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1960 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Shamlal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-24-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Raj256

..... the assumption that the said findings are correct.they have supported the view taken by modi j. about the interpretation o article 295 of the constitution of india. on the other hand, the learned advocates for the plaintiffs have urged that the obligations and liabilities of the former dholpur state had devolved on ..... this difficulty, it is necessary first to decide the question whether tbe united state; of rajasthan could be sued against by the plaintiffs before the constitution of india came into force.27. it is obvious that the present difference would not have arisen between the learned judges if they were to hold that the ..... at the outset that though the learned judges have referred to us only the question relating to the interpretation of article 295 (2) of the constitution of india, yet, if we confine ourselves strictly to the interpretation of that article only we are likely to be misunderstood to mean that we agree with ..... case in hand, there was no question of conquest or cession. the new republic was born on 26-1-1950 and all derived their rights of citizenship from the same source and from the same moment of time; so also, at the same instant and for the same reason, all the territory ..... the footing that the residents of the territories which came under the dominion of the rajpramukh of the united state could not acquire any right of citizenship until the act of state had been completed ought not really arise.there is no interregnum for the completion of the act of state; the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1960 (HC)

Hasan Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-09-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Raj182

..... ever went to pakistan or that he had returned to this country under a passport or visa. section 9 of the citizenship act, 1955, runs as follows:'9. termination of citizenship -- (1) any citizen of india who by naturalisation, registration or otherwise voluntarily acquires, or has at any time between the 26th january, 1950, and ..... in the present case also, the respondents ought to have raised the question before the central government and obtained its decision if thepetitioner had acquired the citizenship of pakistan before taking proceedings against him with regard to his deportation from this country. without obtaining such a decision from the central government the respondents ..... not to have proceeded to deport him bodily outside this country so long as it was not held by a competent authority if he had acquired the citizenship of another country. in mohammad khan v. government of andhra pradesh, air 1957 andh pra 1047 where a similar question had arisen, it was ..... against the petitioner was justified.5. it remains now to consider the point raised by learned deputy government advocate with regard to section 9 of the citizenship act, 1955. it is contended by him that the petitioner ought to have approached the central government under the said section for a certificate before making ..... dave, j.1. this is a writ application under article 226 of the constitution of india by one hasan khan.2. the petitioner's case is, that his parents are residents of amber in jaipur district and that he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //