Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Court: rajasthan Year: 1964 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.016 seconds)

Mar 07 1964 (HC)

Anwar Mohammad Vs. Managing Officer, Cum Custodian of Evacuee Property ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-07-1964

Reported in : AIR1964Raj260

..... before the suit was decided by the bombay high court in its original jurisdiction, constitution of india came into force and proviso to article 225 of the constitution removed the bar previously imposed under section 226(1) of the government of india act, 1935 on the exercise of original jurisdiction by the high court in the ..... his petition in the punjab high court. in our opinion, the amendment of article 226 of the constitution is simply procedural in nature and it does not confer any vested right on the citizen of india.23. now we may examine the authorities cited by both the sides in support of their respective contentions ..... course of procedure. 24. in support of his contention that article 226 of the constitution confers a vested right on the citizensof india, learned deputy govt. advocate has relied onanother authority of the supreme court in khajoorsing v. union of india, air 1961 sc 532 wherein it has been told:'.......under article 226 power is ..... in matters concerning revenue. that bar, therefore, no longer survives. it is true that the constitution had not come into force when the suit was filed, but the provisions of section 226(1) of the government of india act, 1935, relate, in my opinion, entirely to matters of procedure and i have to ..... tyagi, j. 1. this is a writ application by one anwar mohammadunder article 226 of the constitution of india.2. respondents nos. 5 and 6 are not present before the court. shri vishanlal, advocate for respondent no. 6 stated before us .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //