Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 1 of about 66 results (0.053 seconds)

Aug 23 2016 (HC)

Commissioner of Customs (Air), Chennai Vs. P. Sinnasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

..... an indian passport at any time, or he or either of his parents or any of his grand parents, was a citizen of india by virtue of the constitution of india or the citizenship act, 1955 (57 of 1955); provided that the national of pakistan or bangladesh shall be deemed to be not of indian origin. ..... of adjudicatory proceedings. 56. at the time, when discretion is exercised under section 125 and if any challenge is made under article 226 of the constitution of india, the twin test, to be satisfied is "relevance and reason". in the light of the judgments of the hon'ble apex court and applying the ..... to be confiscated. he also imposed penalty. when the said order was tested, by way of a writ petition, under article 226 of the constitution of india and though the revenue, before the writ court contended that the entire gold ought to have been confiscated, taking note of the policy of the ..... provisionally, pending adjudication or after adjudication, and in that context, the role of the courts, in exercise of the powers, under article 226 of the constitution of india, should be confined only to test such satisfaction, arrived at, by the competent authority, with regard to the objects of the customs act, 1962 and ..... the discretion of a judge is the law of tyrants; it is always unknown. it is different in different men. it is casual, and depends upon constitution, temper and passion. in the best it is often times caprice; in the worst it is every vice, folly, and passion to which human nature is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2016 (HC)

Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Additional Director General ...

Court : Chennai

..... origin, if he held an indian passport at any time, or he or either of his parents or any of his grand parents, was a citizen of india by virtue of the constitution of india or the citizenship act, 1955 (57 of 1955); provided that the national of pakistan or bangladesh shall be deemed to be not of indian origin. a spouse (not being ..... conclusion of the adjudicating proceedings, may order provisional release. at the time, when discretion is exercised under section 110a and if any challenge is made under article 226 of the constitution of india, the twin test, to be satisfied is "relevance and reason". testing the discretion exercised by the authority, on both subjective and objective satisfaction, as to why, the goods ..... and liable for confiscation, can be released provisionally, pending adjudication, and in that context, the role of the courts, in exercise of the powers, under article 226 of the constitution of india, should be confined only to test such satisfaction, arrived at, by the competent authority, with regard to the objects of the customs act, 1962 and any other law for the ..... (r) implementation of any treaty, agreement or convention with any country; (s) the compliance of imported goods with any laws which are applicable to similar goods produced or manufactured in india; (t) prevention of dissemination of documents containing any matter which is likely to prejudicially affect friendly relations with any foreign state or is derogatory to national prestige; (u) prevention of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2012 (HC)

G.Karunairaj Vs. State Rep.by the Secretary to Government.

Court : Chennai

..... be any doubt whatsoever that adequate care should be taken to see that no genuine citizen of india is thrown out of the country. a person who claims himself to be a citizen of india in terms of the constitution of india or the citizenship act is entitled to all safeguards both substantive and procedural provided for therein to show that he ..... the burden of proof is on the proceedee, the same by itself would not mean that the procedure is ultra vires the provisions of article 21 of the constitution of india. article 21 would not be offended if the procedure is fair and reasonable.'28. taking a leap forward, the supreme court also held in paragraphs 55 and ..... of the fact that in hans muller of nuremberg vs. supdt. of presidency jail, calcutta {air 1955 sc 367}, a constitution bench of the supreme court held that the power of the central government to expel foreigners from india, is absolute and unfettered or unrestricted. but, two things must be remembered, namely (a) that after the aforesaid decision ..... on him was very sacrosanct.19. in louis de raedt vs union of india {1991 (3) scc 554}, the supreme court reiterated that even a foreign national is entitled to the fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution. while holding so, the supreme court also dealt with the question of the ..... petition under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records in g.o.rt.3749 dated 9.11.2011 passed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2007 (HC)

S. Nalini Srikaran Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Ministry of E ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2007Mad187; (2007)2MLJ831

..... another country, but the only authority to so decide is the government of india acting as a quasi judicial tribunal under the provisions of section 9(2) of the citizenship act, 1955.(iii) section 9(2) of the citizenship act and para 3 of the citizenship rules are intra vires the constitution and valid law.(iv) the proposition that as soon as it is alleged ..... delhi, claiming that both his daughters were entitled to be declared as citizens of india by virtue of article 5 of the constitution and section 4(1) of the citizenship act, 1955. in addition to this claim of indian citizenship, he further stated that they were citizens of britain by virtue of their birth in england and of finland by virtue of their mother ..... application before the competent authority, namely., the ministry of home affairs of the government of india, which alone has the power to consider and adjudicate upon the issue relating to citizenship and the appellant cannot seek any relief from this court under article 226 of the constitution and no writ of mandamus could be issued even without an application being made to the ..... iii and therefore the acquisition of the passport as conclusive proof of the loss of citizenship would not arise....21. in a recent decision in dipali katia chadha v. union of india : (1996)7scc432 , in a writ petition filed before the supreme court under article 32 of the constitution, the father of two petitioners had written a letter to the secretary, ministry of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2006 (HC)

J. Jayalalitha, Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Mad)305

..... in that case had been on erroneous lines since the special rule of the burden of proof had been disregarded. 22. in : air1962sc1052 [izhar ahmad v. union of india], which arose under the citizenship act, there is reference to various texts with regard to presumption. the supreme court in this case observed as follows :in other words, the rule takes away judicial ..... as the necessity and desirability whereof. the consideration so made by the courts below in rejecting the claim of the appellant, could not be held to be either condemnable or constitute any gross or improper failure to exercise their jurisdiction and consequently, it does not call for any interference in our hands. therefore, the appeal fails and shall stand dismissed. ..... learned trial magistrate had come to the conclusion that a prima facie case had been made out, largely based on the statutory presumption under section 278e of the act, the constitutional validity of which was challenged in writ petition nos.23581 to 23584 of 2006. those writ petitions have been dismissed today by a separate order. therefore, the petitioners cannot ..... of equality. the court observed that the sub-sections operate in different fields and that there is a rationale behind the classification, the equality contemplated under article 14 of the constitution cannot be considered to have been violated. the contention which has been raised is based mainly on the ground that since the respondents have already been compensated, parliament could not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1997 (HC)

Daivid John Hopkins Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad366

..... nationals. we are of the further view that section 14(1) of the act is not ultra vires article 14 of the constitution of india because the foreign nationals do not have any fundamental right guaranteed for the grant of citizenship of india. the writ appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed.21. now we will deal with w.p.no. 1247 of 1996, which ..... 1995 was filed by the appellant, who is acitizen of united kingdom, for a declaration that section 14(1) of the citizenship act, 1956 (act 57 of 1955) (hereinafter referred to as the act) ultra vires article 14 of the constitution of india, which embodies the rule of law, and void.3. the case of the appellant, as putforth in the writ affidavit ..... no assistanceto the appellant since the whole case centresround the entitlement of the foreigners theprotection under article 21 of the constitution ofindia.20. for the foregoing reasons, we arc of the view that the government of india have got unrestricted power to refuse citizenship without assigning any reason whatsoever and the appellant being a foreign national cannot claim equal rights under article 14 ..... in the supreme court has held that foreigners arc entitled to the protection of article 21 of the constitution of india. by virtue of their long and prolonged stay in the state, the chakmas, who migrated to and those horn in the state, seek citizenship under the constitution read with section 5 of the act. the supreme court issued certain directions to the authorities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1995 (HC)

Daivid John Hopkins Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1996Mad314; 1995(2)CTC335

..... section 5 or 6 of the said act without assigning any reason for such grant or refusal, when article 14 of the constitution of india enshrine'd the rule of law, the said section 14(1) of th'e citizenship act giving the concerned authority with arbitrary power as there is no guideline provided thereunder either to reject or to grant the registration ..... has applied for the registration of the indian citizenship under section 5(1)(c) of the citizenship act and repeatedly his request has been rejected for registration as citizen ..... returned to united kingdom and in april, 1995, ones came to india.2. the petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging seclion 14(1) of the citizenship act and prays for declaration that the said section 14(1) of the citizenship act, 1955 is ultra vires of article 14 of the constitution of india.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner ..... of india, due to the non-framing of the citizenship rules in respect of british citizens .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1993 (HC)

G. Sumathi Vs. the Director of Medical Education, Madras and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1993Mad328

..... territory of india, and to settle, acquire, hold and dispose of property in any part of that territory. as the supreme ..... the state for which it was being used immediately before the commencement of the constitution, until the legislative of the state otherwise provides by law. in other words, such a legislation must expressly exclude the use of english. our constitution has established a single indian citizenship throughout india. article 19 guarantees to every citizen the fundamental right to move freely throughout the ..... the argument that it is violative of arts. 15 and 16 cannot be accepted. nor again is there any infringement of art. 21. if the constitution is to function in the spirit in which it was conceived, ..... provisions of art. 15 of our constitution forbid discrimination against citizens on the ground of religion, race, caste, sex and place of birth. language is not included in this list, but a discrimination on the ground of language is opposed to the basic concept of the unity of india to which a common indian citizenship and a common country testify. therefore, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1990 (HC)

Poosarilar Ekambaram Pillai Vs. Visalakshmi and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad203

..... adduced before the election tribunal.9. it is necessary now to find out whether the election tribunal has arrived at a correct finding with regard to the citizenship, under art. 5 of the constitution of india.10. it is to be mentioned at this stage, that after remand in the election petition, the first respondent's mother was further examined through an ..... . it will be seen from art. 5 of the constitution of india that at the commencement of the constitution domicile formed a basic condition among others for the acquisition of citizenship. article 5 of the constitution reads as follows :--'5. at the commencement of this constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of india and... (a) who was born in the territory of ..... territory of india; or (c) who has been ordinarily resident ..... india; or (b) either of whose parents was born in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1990 (HC)

Poosariar Ekambaram Pillai Vs. Visalakshi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ90

..... adduced before the election tribunal.9. it is necessary now to find out whether the election tribunal has arrived at a correct finding with regard to the citizenship, under article 5 of the constitution of india.10. it is to be mentioned at this stage, that after remand in the election petition, the first respondent's mother was further examined through an ..... . it will be seen from article 5 of the constitution of india that at the commencement of the constitution domicile formed a basic condition among others for the acquisition of citizenship. article 5 of the constitution reads as follows:5. at the commencement of this constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of india and..(a) who was born in the territory of ..... of india; orc) who has been ordinarily resident in ..... india; or (b) either of whose parents was born in the territory .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //