Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: citizenship constitution of india Year: 1960 Page 4 of about 36 results (0.065 seconds)

Jun 13 1960 (FN)

Clay Vs. Sun Ins. Office, Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-13-1960

..... the court indicates that, when a constitutional question lurks in the case, not even the lower federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction should decide the nonconstitutional questions. [ footnote 2/17 ] of course, this view is not ..... refuses to decide the question (and the related state questions) on the ground, as i read the opinion, that there exists an unbending, unyielding, automatic canon of constitutional adjudication that, if a constitutional question is not "frivolous," the court must page 363 u. s. 223 avoid it unless decision is "compelled" after disposition of all nonconstitutional questions. in fact, ..... of 1954-1955. petitioner reported the losses to the respondent on february 1, 1955, and, on april 1, 1955, respondent denied liability. the action, resting on diversity of citizenship, was instituted in the united states district court for the southern district of florida on may 20, 1957, more than two years after discovery of the losses. the respondent ..... there on which respondent denied liability. more than 12 months after discovery of the losses, petitioner sued respondent in a federal district court in florida, basing jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship. that court awarded a judgment to petitioner after ruling that, (1) under florida law, the losses were not excluded from "all risks" coverage if they were caused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1960 (FN)

Deveau Vs. Braisted

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-06-1960

..... ex-convicts called for drastic action. legislative investigation had established that the presence of page 363 u. s. 158 ex-convicts on the waterfront was not a minor episode, but constituted a principal corrupting influence. the senate subcommittee which investigated for congress conditions on the new york waterfront found that "[c]riminals whose long records belie any suggestion that they can ..... or after the end of such imprisonment, unless, prior to the end of such five-year period, in the case of a person so convicted or imprisoned, (a) his citizenship rights, having been revoked as a result of such conviction, have been fully restored, or (b) the board of parole of the united states department of justice determines that such ..... for the employment of longshoremen is also provided under the supervision of the commission, replacing the archaic, corrupt "shape-up." under the requirement of art. i, 10, of the constitution, the compact was submitted to the congress for its consent, and it was approved. this was no perfunctory consent. congress had independently investigated the evils that gave rise to the ..... waterfront in the port of new york. the solution which was evolved between the two states embodies not only legislation by each, but also joint action by way of a constitutional compact between them, approved by congress, including the establishment of a bi-state waterfront commission. for years, the new york waterfront presented a notoriously serious situation. urgent need for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1960 (FN)

Parker Vs. Ellis

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-16-1960

..... outcome of this adjudication to preclude a finding of mootness. furthermore, there is an important public interest involved in declaring the invalidity of a conviction obtained in violation of the constitution, and, under the court's decisions, this is a consideration relevant to the mootness question. [ footnote 31 ] in sum, i cannot agree with the court that george parker's case ..... texas has not ended. the unconstitutional judgment rendered against him has a continuing effect because, under texas law, "[a]ll persons convicted of any felony except those restored to full citizenship and right of suffrage or pardoned" are disqualified from voting. texas election code, art. 5.01. the loss of these civil rights prevents a case from becoming page 362 u ..... . page 362 u. s. 591 iii the concurring opinion raises another objection to granting parker relief. while the court's opinion simply construes the statute, the concurring opinion construes the constitution. the court's opinion would not foreclose congress from authorizing relief in a case like parker's; the concurring opinion would. while the court's decision is based on the ..... state court in which petitioner was, according to his claim, denied due process of law as guaranteed by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the united states constitution. after hearing, the district court dismissed the petition. the court of appeals for the fifth circuit, with one judge dissenting, affirmed the order of dismissal, 258 f.2d 937, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1960 (FN)

Hess Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-18-1960

..... involved, resemble some admiralty doctrines, with which also we are not now concerned, more than do comparable provisions in the state's general wrongful death statute, which presumably can be constitutionally applied to a maritime tort. with all deference, i must say that the total irrelevance of that fact seems plain. we are not reviewing the general constitutionality page 361 u ..... label "wrongful death act." it may be that the court does not intend to go so far. it asserts, albeit almost as an afterthought, that some state doctrines might be constitutionally inapplicable to maritime torts, notwithstanding that they are embodied in a death statute. [ footnote 2/17 ] it then summarily finds the possible reservation inapplicable in this instance on the ground ..... the rights and liabilities of the parties. carlisle packing co. v. sandanger, 259 u. s. 255 , 259 u. s. 259 . where the plaintiff exercises the right conferred by diversity of citizenship to choose a federal forum, the result is no different, even though he exercises the further right to a jury trial. whatever doubt may once have existed on that score ..... court of appeals affirmed, holding that the trial court had not erred in finding that negligence had not been proved, and agreeing that the employers' liability law "could not be constitutionally applied to this case." the appellate court expressly refrained from deciding "whether the trial court was also correct in ruling that, if that act were applied, the united states would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 20 1960 (FN)

Schilling Vs. Rogers

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-20-1960

..... against. anti-nazis and non-nazis do not constitute a political group." (citing past administrative decisions.) [ footnote 9 ] section 9(a) authorizes "[a]ny person not an enemy or ally of enemy" ..... in said subsection, and with like effect. the president or the court, as the case may be, may make the same determinations with respect to citizenship and other relevant facts that the president is authorized make under the provisions of subsection (b) hereof." as added, 41 stat. 980, as amended, ..... decision as follows: "even if it were to be assumed that denial of a license to practice law deprived claimant of full rights of citizenship, his claim must be disallowed for the reason that he was not a member of a political, racial or religious group that was discriminated ..... racial, or religious groups, has at no time between december 7, 1941, and the time when such law, decree, or regulation was abrogated, enjoyed full rights of citizenship under the law of such nation. . . ." [ footnote 7 ] on may 16, 1946, the president delegated his functions under 32(a) to the alien property ..... relevant period, he, as an "anti-nazi," claimed to have been a discriminated-against political group, had been deprived of full rights of german citizenship, in that he had been denied admission to the practice of law. a hearing examiner recommended allowance of the claim, but his recommendation was rejected .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1960 (FN)

Michalic Vs. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-07-1960

..... event, respondent waived reliance on any by expressly disclaiming surprise at the trial. [ footnote 4 ] the petitioner does not invoke the district court's jurisdiction on grounds of diversity of citizenship. thus, there is jurisdiction on the law side of the court of the unseaworthiness claim only as "pendent" to jurisdiction under the jones act. romero v. international terminal operating co .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //