Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Jun-10-1999
..... of the south 76 (1965). the reconstruction-era vagrancy laws had especially harsh consequences on african-american women and children. l. kerber, no constitutional right to be ladies: women and the obligations of citizenship 50-69 (1998). neither this history nor the scholarly compendia in justice thomas' dissent, post, at 102-106, persuades us that the ..... of proof upon the defendant to establish that loitering is not a "fundamental liberty." it never does marshal any support for the proposition that loitering is a constitutional right, contenting itself with a (transparently inadequate) explanation of why the historical record of laws banning loitering does not positively contradict that proposition,6 and the ( ..... "this is not an ordinance that simply regulates business behavior and contains a scienter requirement .... it is a criminal law that contains no mens rea requirement ... and infringes on constitutionally protected rights." ante, at 55 (internal quotation marks omitted). (poor alexander hamilton, who has seen his "commercial republic" devolve, in the eyes of the plurality, at ..... price to pay for liberation of their streets. the majority today invalidates this perfectly reasonable measure by ignoring our rules governing facial challenges, by elevating loitering to a constitutionally guaranteed right, and by discerning vagueness where, according to our usual standards, none exists. i respondents' consolidated appeal presents a facial challenge to the chicago ordinance on .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-11-1999
Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)180; 79(1999)DLT16; 1999(49)DRJ803
..... indorsee the property therein with right of further negotiation; but the indorsement may, by express words, restrict or include such right, or may merely constitute the indorsee an agent to indorse the instrument or to receive its contents for the indorser, or for some other specified person. illustration b ..... not an assignee within the meaning of the act of 1875 18 stat. at l. 470. he is entitled to sue without reference to the citizenship of any previous holder. we perceive no error in the record and the judgment must be affirmed. it is so ordered.'112. on the 18th ..... s fair growth financial services ltd is terribly involved in multi-crore security scandal wherein you are also involved. the govt./custodian/reserve bank of india (rbi) has already required you to pay about rs.500 crores on account of your involvement in the said scandal. since m/s fair growth ..... , which reads as under:-'(2)(c) 'securities' includes- (i) shares, scrips, stocks, bonds, debentures, debenture stock, units of the unit trust of india or any other mutual fund or other marketable securities of a like nature in or of any incorporated company or other body corporate; (ii) government securities; and ..... such properties including, all movable and immovable properties, bank accounts, fixed deposits, shares, scrips, stocks, bonds, debentures, units of the unit trust of india or any other mutual fund or other marketable securities, vehicles, tenancy rights, etc. as on the date of notification, held by them in the name .....Tag this Judgment!