Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: code of criminal procedure amendment act 2005 section 12 Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 2,396 results (0.186 seconds)

Dec 01 2014 (HC)

Balmukund Dubey and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Another

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... filed the instant petition stating inter alia that though section 438 (1-b) of the code has been brought into statute book by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 but the said provision has not brought into force as on date under sub section (2) of section 1 of the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 and, therefore, order directing personal presence of the ..... the parties and considered the rival submissions made therein and perused the record with utmost circumspection. (8) section 438 of the principal act was amended by section 38 of the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 (no. 25 of 2005) with effect from 23.06.2005, which reads as under:- ??(1b) the presence of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail shall be obligatory ..... central government by notification in the official gazette as required under sub-section (2) of section 1 of the act, 2005 ..... notification issued by central government would show that section 38 of the amending act, 2005 by which section 438 of the code has been amended and section 438(1-b) has been inserted, has not been brought into force by aforesaid notification. (12) thus, as on date section 438(1-b) of the act, 2005 has not been brought into force by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2014 (FN)

Brian William Achurch Vs. the Queen

Court : Australia High Court

..... 2005] hca 12; (2005) 223 clr 1 at 17 [34]; [2005] hca 12. [106] cf barbaro v the queen (2014) 88 aljr 372 at 382 [61]; [2014] hca 2; 305 alr 323 at 335-336; [2014] hca 2. [107] section 19 (renumbered s 24) of the criminal procedure act 1986 (nsw), introduced by the criminal procedure (amendment) act 1988 (nsw). [108] section 100ha of the justices act 1902 (nsw), introduced by the justices (amendment) act ..... , parliamentary debates (hansard), 1 may 1986 at 3591. [47] new south wales, legislative council, parliamentary debates (hansard), 18 november 1986 at 6514. [48] criminal procedure (amendment) act 1988 (nsw), s 3. [49] statute law (miscellaneous provisions) act 1989 (nsw), sched 2. [50] unlike s 43, s 24(1) provided expressly that the court "whether or not differently constituted" might re-open the proceedings ..... much emphasis was placed in those decisions upon the remedial purpose of the provisions. the remedial purpose of s 24 of the criminal procedure act was invoked in ho v director of public prosecutions[53] to justify giving the section "the widest possible operation", extending to the correction of a sentence imposed as a result of "an error of law in ..... [76] [1990] 3 nzlr 39 at 40. [77] [1990] 3 nzlr 39 at 41. [78] section 372 of the crimes act 1961 (nz), and the similar provision, s 77 of the summary proceedings act 1957 (nz), were repealed, and were replaced by ss 180182 of the criminal procedure act 2011 (nz). [79] [1962] ussc 23; 368 us 424 at 430 (1962). [80] [2013] .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2014 (SC)

Vishal Agrawal and anr. Vs. Chattisgarh State Electricity Board Andanr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... position was made abundantly clear namely cognizance of an offence punishable under the act could be taken upon a report of police officer filed under section 173 of the code of criminal procedure. contention of the appellants that the said amendment came into effect only from 15.6.2007 with the passing of electricity amendment act, 2007 has been repelled by the high court taking note of the ..... the cases under this act are also to be governed by the code of criminal procedure.24. in this backdrop, the notification dated 8.6.2005 issued by the central government in exercise of powers under section 176 of the electricity act also requires a mention. vide this notification the electricity rules, 2005, have been framed and rule 12, which is relevant, reads as under:12. (1) the police shall ..... prejudice the actions under the provisions of the indian penal code. the principal electricity act, 2003 was further amended by the electricity (amendment) act, 2007 and apart from other amendments in section 151 of the prinicipal act was also amended and provisions in sections 151, 151(a), 151 (b) were inserted. in the statement of objects and reasons for amending the act, it was stated as under: 4. as per the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2014 (HC)

Petta Satya Govinda Ramachandra Rao @ Ba Vs. Yarlagadda Vijaya Kumar A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... is by further amendment under act 55 of 2002 which came into force with effect from 06.02.2003 incorporating new sections 143 to 147 in this chapter by amending the existing sections among 138 to 142 to some extent; by introduction of section 144 regarding mode of service of summons with non- abstanti clause which reads: 'notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 and ..... 1043 of 2005 was later admitted and ..... and empowerment by section 143(1) of the n.i.act. 2) against said acquittal judgment the complainant preferred the appeal before this high court under section 378(4) cr.p.c with leave that was granted on 11.07.2005 as per the law as on that date (since section 372 cr.p.c came into force from 31.12.2009).the criminal appeal no. ..... (2006).scc4565. (1999).scc5106. (2004).scc7747. 2003(1) ls4678. air2011sc11379. air1966(all.)84(fb) 10. 1982(2) (sc) aplj4311. air(sc)2004-408: (para-12) 12. 2011(1) ald (crl.) 201 (ap) 13. (1983).scc17714. air1965sc44415. (2013)11 scc45116. (2005).scc40017. (1990).scc36618. air1961sc159619. air1976sc99720. air1977sc26521. (2001).scc6122. (2002).scc53323. 1990 sc98124. (2002).scc29725. air1996sc218426. 2013(3) crimes (p&h)-613 27. 2011 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2014 (HC)

K.Jaya L Vs. G.Adi Laxmi and Anot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... regard to substantiate the conclusion of the order under review is of chairman, village panchayath vs. thimmasetty no doubt in interpreting the scope of section 417 code of criminal procedure, 1899 (old) which is equivalent to section 378 of the code of 1973 (present) holding that the words used need not be confined to order under original jurisdiction of the lower court for maintaining appeal ..... the canons of criminal jurisprudence where two views are possible. in this case right of the complainant so far as under section 138 read with 142 of the negotiable instruments act is concerned practically within the meaning of victim defined in section 2 (wa) read with the proviso to section 372 cr.p.c amended by the amended act 5/ 2009 which came into force 31.12.2009. needless ..... commission but for to invoke the constitutional remedy against the first appellate court order of the state commission. it is no doubt not a case under the criminal procedure codecriminal procedure codecriminal procedure code but under the consumer protection act and that cannot be taken as a guidance without referring to and without comparison of the actual words used and the intendment of the legislatures and their ..... is to the court of sessions. this court in fact on the scope of section 2 (wa) and proviso to section 372 cr.p.c, referring to several expressions of other high courts and of this court, answered the same in detail in crl.a no.1043 of 2005, dated 26.02.2014.7. in fact but for the limited say that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2014 (SC)

Mohd.Haroon and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be recovered as she said that she had thrown it. her 164 crpccrpccrpc statement was registered on 09.12.13. the earlier attempts to register her statement u/s 164 crpccrpccrpc could not succeed because she was not available even though safina was sent to her under section 160 crpccrpccrpc. in her 164 crpccrpccrpc statement she accused all the 5 named person of committing the crime ..... state has moved before the court of sessions. the details furnished show that in 26 cases in which the accused persons were charged with various offences under ipcipcipc read with criminal amendment act, though court concerned has granted bail, the state has moved an application for cancellation of the same. the state authorities are directed to pursue the same effectively. it is ..... the allahabad high court. it is also brought to our notice that against mr. sangeet som, a case crime no.888/13 under sections 153a, 420, 120b and 66ae of the it actit actit act read with 7th criminal law amendment act was lodged in which it was alleged that the accused had uploaded a false and inflammatory video clipping intended to incite communal violence in ..... of recovery of ak-47, 9 mm cartridges in village kirthal, the police have to identify the persons concerned and proceed against them under the provisions of ipcipcipc and arms act.5) in respect of case crime no.148/2013, p.s. fugana, case crime no.403/2013, 404/2013 p.s. jansath, more efforts must be taken for apprehending .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (HC)

Daulat Singh @ Gattu and anr Vs. State of Raj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the application seeking release on bail/suspension of sentence in the matters where the conviction is recorded for the offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1985 .). 2 the discussions made by learned single bench while making reference to the larger bench read as under:- ?? ? ? ? ??? ??? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ??? ????? ? ? ?! ?? ?? $ 2009 air scw3648(union of india vs ..... 1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur. answer to the reference in db criminal misc. ivth bail application no.1111/2013 in sb criminal appeal no.517/2010 daulat singh @ gatu versus state of rajasthan date of judgment ::22. d april, 2014 hon'ble mr.justice govind mathur hon'ble mr.justice atul kumar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2014 (HC)

Bhakta Bahadur and Others Vs. Inspector General of Prisons, State of G ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... victim. 8. the expression victim? is not defined in the prisons act. the definition of victim? in the code of criminal procedure shall, therefore, have to be relied upon. the definition of victim? in section 2(wa) of the cr. p.c., has itself been provided in the amending act 5 of 2009, amending the code of criminal procedure, 1973. this was also in aid of the doctrine of victimology. the ..... deduction of 50% of the wages earned by them which have been appropriated to the common victims compensation fund, which has been created under section 36-a of the prisons act, 1894, as amended by the prisons (goa amendment) act, 2005 and the rules framed there-under being the goa prisons rules, 2006. 2. one tommy thomas who was convicted under the ndps actndps actndps actndps act ..... in the case of an offence against an individual, be it murder, rape, dacoity or any other, the person who is victimized may be in the singular, in the case of offences under the ndps actndps actndps actndps actndps act, the ..... the offence under the ndps actndps actndps actndps actndps act is taken to be so serious as to require a strict minimum sentence and fine and in which provisions of bail are applied more stringently than the offences under the general criminal law. a similar analogy, therefore, must apply to who is victimised by such crime. 12. it may be mentioned that whereas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2014 (SC)

Sundeep Kumar Bafna Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... benches of this court should hesitate to remodel its ratio.18. it will also be germane to briefly cogitate on the fasciculous captioned section 438 of the code of civil procedure, as amended by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 of the 203rd report of the law commission. although, the law commission was principally focused on the parameters of anticipatory bail, it ..... bail, since he is already under restraint. the provisions relating to the anticipatory bail may not be attracted in such a case . an amendment was proposed to the provisions vide crpccrpccrpc (amendment) act, 2005 making the presence of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail obligatory at the time of final hearing of the application for enlargement on bail. the said ..... 2005) 12 scc709 in which raghubans dubey vs state of bihar, air1967sc1167 was applied. therefore, the high court was not justified in directing the appellant to appear before the magistrate.23. on behalf of the state, the submission is that the prosecution should be afforded a free and fair opportunity of subjecting the accused to custody for interrogation as provided under section 167 crpccrpccrpc ..... (1984), a roadside questioning of a motorist detained pursuant to a routine traffic stop was not seen as analogous to custodial interrogation requiring adherence to miranda rules.12. it appears to us from the above analysis that custody, detention and arrest are sequentially cognate concepts. on the occurrence of a crime, the police is likely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2014 (HC)

Damodar Prasad Maheshwari (Somani) and Another Vs. Sagar Onkardas Nyat ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the question purely from the point of view of the complainant without at all adverting to any defence that the accused may have. 10. section 202 cr.p.c. was amended by the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 2005 and the following words were inserted : "and shall, in a case where the accused is residing at a place beyond the area in which ..... he exercises his jurisdiction," the notes on clauses for the above mentioned amendment read as follows : "false complaints are filed against persons residing at far ..... he submits that, perusal of the complaint shows that the accused persons were not residents of the local jurisdiction of the court and in view of the amendment to section 202 of the criminal procedure codecriminal procedure codecriminal procedure code, 1973 (cr.p.c. for short), it was incumbent upon the magistrate to carry out an enquiry himself or direct investigation under ..... of process against the accused nos.1 and 3 (present applicants) although both of them were not residing within local jurisdiction of the chief judicial magistrate. 6. section 202(1) of the criminal procedure codecriminal procedure codecriminal procedure code reads as under: "202. postponement of issue of process. - (1) any magistrate, on receipt of a complaint of an offence of which he is authorised .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //