Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: companies act 2013 section 442 mediation and conciliation panel Page 1 of about 504 results (0.445 seconds)

May 13 2015 (HC)

Ms Tulsyan Metals Pvt Ltd Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

M/S Dayal Steels Ltd. Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and A

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

M/S Maihar Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and A

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

Balmukund Sponge and Iron Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

M/S Balashre Metals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and A

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

M S Sundaram Ferro Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

Ms Super Steel Casting Ltd Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

Ms Atibir Industrial Co Ltd Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

M S Shivam Iron and Steel Co Ltd Sms Division Vs. Damodar Valley Corpo ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2015 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Jharkhand

..... c ac h & a, rajbhasa, town services, bokaro steel plant, p.o. & p.s. & dist. bokaro. petitioner with w.p. (c) no. 6 of 2013 swati concast & power private limited, a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956 having its unit at bhadradih, giridih through its authorised signatory sri rajeev kumar gupta, son of late d.n. gupta, resident of tetritoli ..... submitted that the dvc has no objection, if the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms and conditions of the agreement read with section 47 of the electricity act and clause 10 (2) of the regulation. 12 7. in view of the aforesaid submission of the parties, these applications are disposed of with following direction:- (i) ..... by jharkhand state electricity regulatory commission (in short 'jserc') has no application on dvc because previously dvc was only a transmission licensee. it is submitted that according to section 79 of the electricity act tariff determined by the central electricity regulatory commission (in short 'cerc') was applicable to the dvc, because dvc is generating and selling electricity in more than one state ..... electricity regulatory commission. thus, the dvc is not entitled to raise any bill for security amount as provided under section 10 (2) of the regulation.5. however, learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after determination of distribution tariff for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, the petitioners are ready to pay the security amount as per the terms .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //