Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: allahabad Year: 1988

Dec 19 1988 (HC)

U.P. Avas Evam Vikash Parishad and ors. Vs. Dr. N.V. Rajgopalan Achary ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-1988

Reported in : AIR1989All125

..... in damages recoverable in the action if the uncertainty were resolved in his favour at the trial; but the plaintiff's need for such protection must be weighed against the corresponding need of the defendant to be protected against injury resulting from his having been prevented from exercising his own legal rights for which he could not be adequately compensated under ..... in governing in all inclusive rule, which would encompass the factual situation in all cases, that is, each case, so far as the application of the doctrines of relative or comparative injury is concerned, rest upon the particular or peculiar circumstances of that case. in american cyanamid co. v. ethicon ltd., (1975) 1 all er 504 house of lords laid down ..... may be deemed fit in the circumstances of the case, may also be awarded to the plaintiffs against the defendants. 3. they alleged that the state government exercising, power under section 3 of the uttar pradesh avas evam vikas parishad adhiniyam, 1965 established the parishad to execute housing and improvement schemes, other projects and to co-ordinate various housing activities in ..... injunction should be given or awarded only in clear cases.18. another matter which needs to be emphasised at this place is that the parishad has been created by the act for achieving laudable objects and if such an injunction, as was granted in this case, was given, the result would be that a huge public fund would' remain unpaid resulting .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //