Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Oct-23-2002
Reported in : 2003(1)AWC91; (2003)ILLJ442All
..... across the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner is tenable in law. the state government was fully competent to adopt the existing corresponding pay scales already prevailing in the government department and existing and already in existence from their respective dates mentioned in the notification. the adoption for ..... the state government. in the conspectus of what has been discussed above, it follows that by the impugned notification welfare officers have been granted corresponding existing scales what were admissible and were being disbursed to the state government employees and by this reckoning, it cannot be disputed that whatever the ..... to the contents of para nos. 24 and 25 of the writ petition, it is stated that the assertions are totally vague as no comparative data of wage structure of the officers of the petitioner units have been furnished so that the hon'ble court may be able to examine ..... of rule 3 (1) and sent to the government for the pay scales, qualification and other conditions of service vide letter dated 21st september, 1983 and since this matter was pending consideration in the meantime the second pay commission report was enforced from the year 1979. pay scales were further ..... (2) read with sections 50 and 112 of factories act, the state of u. p. has power to fix pay scale and salary of welfare officers working in the factory? (2) whether the welfare officers are entitled to get salary payable to state employees in corresponding pay scale? (3) whether state .....Tag this Judgment!