Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.027 seconds)

Mar 01 2012 (TRI)

S.S. Ingaleshwar and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

..... however, approval of government of india need not be sought in regard to adoption of scales or pay and allowances identical to those adopted for corresponding posts as per the central govt. orders issued from time to time. since there was no need for approval of government of india in regard ..... high court of judicature : andhra pradesh at hyderabad in writ petition no. 14046/1993 decided on 06.01.2003 in which the denial of corresponding scale of rs.1640-2900/- to the stenographer gr.ii of nwda was held to be unjustified. 4.4 it may be stated here that ..... and substantially different. the other post may not require any higher qualification, seniority or other like factors granting parity in pay scales depends upon the comparative evaluation of job and equation of posts. the person claiming parity, must plead necessary averments and prove that all things are equal between the concerned ..... 01.01.1996. he further submits that the employees of cwc in the grade of office superintendent are eligible for promotion to the rank of section officer, under secretary, etc. as is available to members of central secretariat ministerial cadre. 4.3 learned counsel for the applicants further submits that ..... examined afresh in depth in consultation with the ministry of finance (mof). there is no dispute that nwda is a society registered under society registration act, whereas cwc is an attached office of the central government. therefore, the status of employees working in nwda and cwc is quite different. 6. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2012 (TRI)

Chaudhari Rakesh Ekanath Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary, Min ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-2012

..... reasonable number. such reduction in the number of pay scales has to be achieved by resorting to broadbanding of posts by placing different posts having comparable job charts in a common scale. substantial reduction in the number of pay scales must inevitably lead to clubbing of posts and grades which were earlier different ..... finance. regarding (iii) and (iv) above, upgradation may be done by the ministries concerned in consultation with their integrated finance. section ii ( in rupees) post present scale revised pay scale corresponding pay band and grade pay pay grade band pay para no. of the report 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 ..... to implement the same. as noted earlier, in the present case the high court has not even made any attempt to compare the nature of duties and responsibilities of the two sections of employees, one in the state secretariat and the other in the central secretariat. it has also ignored the basic ..... see in this connection the observations of the constitution bench of this court in the case of d. s. nakara v. union of india, ( 1983) 2 scr-165: air 1983 sc 130). see also p. k. ramachandra iyer v. union of india, (1984) 2 scr 200: (air 1984 sc 541), where this court ..... proper reasons and without being conscious of the fact that fixation of pay is not their function. it is the function of the government which normally acts on the recommendations of a pay commission. change of pay scale of a category has a cascading effect. several other categories similarly situated, as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //