Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: chennai Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.048 seconds)

Feb 07 2006 (HC)

The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-07-2006

Reported in : (2006)IIILLJ897Mad

..... regulations, as were applicable to them under the government of madras prior to the 1st july, 1957, until corresponding service rules and regulations are framed by the board, under sub-section (c) of section 79 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (central act liv of 1948).(2) the said staff who were in government service till 30.6.57 and who have opted ..... proceedings no. 445, transitory regulations were framed. these regulations were to be applicable to the staff of the government electricity department till corresponding rules and regulations are framed by the board under section 79(c) of the electricity supply act, 1958. the relevant regulations are extracted below:(1) the said staff shall continue to be governed by the same service rules and ..... the 1960 regulations were first operative, the state government had replaced the then existent civil service regulations with the tamil nadu pension rules and the tamil nadu pension rules, 1978. correspondingly, by the 1995 amendment, the expression 'civil service regulations' in regulation 9 was replaced by 'the tamil nadu pension rules' and 'the tamil nadu pension rules, 1978'. regulation 9 ..... tamil nadu administrative tribunal. if the chairman of the electricity board was of the opinion that on a total consideration of the financial capacity of the board and also the comparative scales of pension received by the board's pensioners and the government pensioners it was not necessary to adopt g.o. ms. nos. 272 and 273, then we cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2006 (HC)

Chanda Softy Ice Cream a partnership concern rep. by Its Partner, Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Reported in : LC2007(1)11; (2006)4MLJ1769; 2006(33)PTC703(Mad)

..... compensated in damages recoverable in the action if the uncertainty were resolved in his favour at the trial. the need for such protection has, however, to be weighed against the corresponding need of the defendant to be protected against injury resulting from his having been prevented from exercising his own legal rights for which he could not be adequately compensated. the ..... protect the party from the species of injury. in other words, irreparable injury or damage would ensue before the legal right would be established at trial; and (3) that the comparative hardship or mischief or inconvenience which is likely to occur from withholding the injunction will be greater than that would be likely to arise from granting it.'d) in mahadeo ..... learned single judge in granting injunction restraining the appellant from using the trade mark 'milky way' is contrary to law and in particular the provisions contained in section 29 of the trade and merchandise marks act, and while granting the said order the principle of balance of convenience had not been carefully considered.b) that well settled principles established by the decisions ..... 'milky way' is registered in india under no. 3686, dated 19th, august, 1942, in class 30, in respect of chocolates and sweet meats and under no. 400610, dated 27th january, 1983, in class no. 30, in respect of confectionery biscuits and chocolates. the registration have been duly renewed and they are still valid and subsisting. the applicant had also applied for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //