Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Sep-19-2006
Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ122Guj
..... doubt article 227 confers a right of superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises the jurisdiction but no corresponding right is conferred upon a litigant to invoke the jurisdiction under the said article as a matter of right. in fact power under this article ..... less than the minimum wages fixed under the notification. if the out put given by the workman is less, then, wages also would be less compared to the out put which ultimately would result into less payment then the minimum wages. the authority therefore, considering the settlement exh. 88 in light ..... in respect of all the three matters. the period for which recovery application was filed under section 20(3) of the act was from january, 1998 to march, 1998. government labour officer has prepared chart of difference of minimum wages payable by the petitioner co. vide exh. 12, reply was filed by the ..... of the constitution of india.35. this aspect has been examined by the apex court in sanjit roy v. state of rajasthan reported in : (1983)illj220sc thereof, the apex court observed as under:5. we must then proceed to consider whether on the facts the labour provided by the workers employed ..... support of his submissions, he relied upon the decision of the apex court in case of sanjit roy v. state of rajasthan reported in : (1983)illj220sc . he has drawn attention of this court to para 5 of said decision which will be considered afterwards.12. he also placed reliance upon the .....Tag this Judgment!