Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 3 results (0.073 seconds)

Feb 04 2009 (HC)

Pawanjay Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2009Jhar105; 2009(57)BLJR1437

..... iron ore and manganese ore to the respondent no. 7 under the provisions of section 5(1) and section 11(5) of the m.m.d. & r. act, 1957. the chart containing the comparative merits of each of the applicants was also enclosed with the forwarding letter. correspondences were exchanged by and between the state and the central governments giving the details of ..... such claim, the state government had allowed all the applicants including the petitioner, opportunity of being heard and a comparative chart was prepared on the basis of the criteria as laid down under the provisions of section 11(3) of the act. such exercise was undertaken to enable the petitioner and the other rival claimants to establish their superior claims which, ..... 's representation, vide its letter dated 13.09.2005, alongwith the other informations sought for under a comparative chart specifying the details concerning each of the items as per criteria laid down under the provisions of section 11(3) of the act.learned counsel explains that after going through all the relevant informations including the clarifications submitted by the state ..... grounds and arguments, learned counsel would refer to the comparative chart prepared by the concerned authorities of the state government based on the informations supplied by the individual applicants. learned counsel would explain that undisputedly the respondent no. 7 was the first applicant in terms of section 11(2) of the act, who had a preferential right of consideration over .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2017 (HC)

Dr Kalipada Mohanta Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

..... to be fake and forged and m/s jayant agencies is not an authorized dealer of lg company. he further mentioned in the note that as per the comparative chart, m/s jayant agencies was l-1 for lg acs and even though m/s. jayant agencies was not an authorized dealer of split a.cs of ..... . 7,38,000/- to the central university of jharkhand. the firm has thus caused total loss of rs. 7,92,420/- to central university of jharkhand and corresponding wrongful gain. so far as petitioner, shri shyam narayan, petitioner in a.b.a. no. 3421 of 2016 is concerned while functioning as registrar and chairman of ..... and criminal misconduct and pursuance thereof, by abusing his official position, caused a wrongful gain of rs. 7,38,414.00/- to the above mentioned private firm and corresponding wrongful loss to the central university of jharkhand, brambe, ranchi in the matter of procurement of 217 nos. of split air conditioners of lg company alongwith accessories, ..... e. 7 acs of 2 tons and 10 a.cs of 1.5 tons at higher rates of rs. 29,990 and rs. 24,9990/- respectively as compared to the rates of the authorized dealer m/s maruti sales. thus cuj was put to a wrongful loss of rs. 3490 per split a.c of 2 ..... the c.b.i petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with the case registered under sections 120b read with 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) r/w 13(1)9d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988.. the case of the prosecution is that information has been received from a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2009 (HC)

Brahmi Impex Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2735

..... the petitioner, it has been stated that the petitioner's case was not recommended as per the provisions of section 11(3) a, b, c, d of the m.m.d.r. act, 1957.it is apparent therefore that though in the first comparative chart, the remarks suggest that the petitioner's application was not considered on account of the pending litigation, but the ..... committee conducted the hearing on 18.01.2008 and heard each of the applicants, including the petitioner on its merits vis--vis the prescribed parameters as laid down under the act and the corresponding rules and upon assessing the superior merit of the respondent no. 8, the committee made its recommendation in favour of the respondent no. 8 under the provisions of ..... information, which the petitioner had already supplied and a comparative examination was made vis--vis, the other applicants. this would only emphasize that in the decision-making process, the concerned authorities of the state government did adhere to the provisions of law as contained both in the m.m.d.r. act and the corresponding rules. the petitioner cannot dispute the authority of ..... section 5(1) of the m.m.d.r. act, 1957 for grant of lease. the proceeding of the committee, the details of which were recorded in annexure-11, filed by the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2003 (HC)

Kew Construction Private Ltd. Etc. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors. Etc ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : II(2003)BC380; [2003(2)JCR53(Jhr)]

..... counsel for the petitioner v.k. sahani const. (india) pvt. ltd. (6910/02) while adopted the argument advanced by mr. ram balak mahto, senior counsel, also placed reliance on the comparative chart enclosed by the respondents and the decision of the tender committee to suggest that local factor was the main factor to allot the works in favour of the contesting respondents ..... that they are 'local contractors' but also on other grounds such as, their seniority in registration as contractors, annual turn over and work experience.11. admittedly, the respective petitioners and corresponding respondents quoted same rate. they are experienced & registered contractors. when everything is equal then some factors are to be taken into consideration by the competent authority for elimination and to ..... wp (c) no. 83 of 2003 submitted tender papers in respect to groups 1, 3 and 4 works.4. curiously, the contesting respondents of the respective writ petitions and the corresponding petitioners, all of them, and some others quoted same rate i.e. 15% below the estimated cost. thereafter, the work orders having issued in favour of some of the contesting ..... nigam ltd., 2002 (1) jljr 421, held that it is not the function of a judge to act as a super board to substitute its judgment for that of the administrator.14. in the facts and circumstances, the quotations of petitioners and the corresponding contractors to whom the works have been allotted, being same, the contractors in whose favour, the works have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2017 (HC)

Narendra Pal Garg Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

..... a.n.tigga and kiran jain in the presence of the bidders. on 22.3.2012 a comparative chart in respect of the 8 bidders who participated in the nit was prepared by shri a.n.tigga. as per comparative chart out of the remaining three firms m/s pratiba & company was shown as l-1 as ..... been found and by abusing their official position, caused a wrongful gain of rs. 4,51,500.00 (approx) to the above mentioned private firms and corresponding wrongful loss to the central university of jharkhand, ranchi. it is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused ranjit kumar sinha @ ranjit sinha and abhay nindkan ..... as above, by abusing their official positions, caused a wrongful loss of rs.4,51,500.00 (approx) to the central university of jharkhand and corresponding wrongful gain to the above mentioned private firm, in the matter of procurement of 43 nos. of split air conditioners of lg company at exorbitant and fraudulently ..... obtained any pecuniary advantage thereby. it was the obligation of the prosecution to satisfy the aforesaid mandatory ingredients which could implicate the appellant under the provisions of section 13 (1) (d)(ii). the attempt of the prosecution was to bring the case within the fold of clause (ii) alleging that he misused his ..... the cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.03(a)/2015-r, registered under section 420/468/471 of the ipc read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2017 (HC)

Manoj Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

..... a.n.tigga and kiran jain in the presence of the bidders. on 22.3.2012 a comparative chart in respect of the 8 bidders who participated in the nit was prepared by shri a.n.tigga. as per comparative chart out of the remaining three firms m/s pratiba & company was shown as l-1 as ..... been found and by abusing their official position, caused a wrongful gain of rs. 4,51,500.00 (approx) to the above mentioned private firms and corresponding wrongful loss to the central university of jharkhand, ranchi. it is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused ranjit kumar sinha @ ranjit sinha and abhay nindkan ..... as above, by abusing their official positions, caused a wrongful loss of rs.4,51,500.00 (approx) to the central university of jharkhand and corresponding wrongful gain to the above mentioned private firm, in the matter of procurement of 43 nos. of split air conditioners of lg company at exorbitant and fraudulently ..... obtained any pecuniary advantage thereby. it was the obligation of the prosecution to satisfy the aforesaid mandatory ingredients which could implicate the appellant under the provisions of section 13 (1) (d)(ii). the attempt of the prosecution was to bring the case within the fold of clause (ii) alleging that he misused his ..... the cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.03(a)/2015-r, registered under section 420/468/471 of the ipc read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2017 (HC)

Narendra Pal Garg Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

..... contractors in which cpwd was deliberately excluded. for empanelment of group a contractors, a comparative chart was prepared by the petitioner and the other co-accused persons in which cpwd was fraudulently excluded on the ground that it charges 27.5% of ..... rs.25 crores. it is, further, alleged that as a part of the conspiracy to award the building construction work to the favoured firms, a comparative chart was prepared by the petitioner and the co-accused persons of central university of jharkhand, ranchi for empanelment of group a, b, c & d ..... pursuance thereof, cheated the central university of jharkhand (cuj), ranchi, by causing to it a wrongful loss of rs.7,11,89,776/- approximately and corresponding wrongful gain to himself and co-accused persons, in the matter of award of construction works of different buildings for the permanent campus of cuj, located ..... at 7% and 5% above the l-1 rate which is a wrongful loss to the university and corresponding wrongful gain to the private parties which is calculated and tabulated in a tabular chart in the charge sheet. it is alleged that the petitioner also issued the order for payment. hence, ..... sheet has been submitted against the petitioner along with the co-accused persons punishable under section 120b read with 420, 468, 471 of the indian penal code and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of pc act, 1988. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2016 (HC)

Jyoti Goel Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of Invest ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... marked the file to the joint secretary on 11.12.2007 with a request to obtain the signatures of all the members on the comparative chart as well as on the price bids. the proposal was approved by shri b.k. munda, joint secretary on the same day. on 18.12.2007 he put up the ..... committee and it appears that by placing the orders to m/s savitri sales a wrongful pecuniary loss of rs. 1,05,93,000/- was caused to state rch and corresponding wrongful pecuniary gain to the suppliers and / or to the others on account of the purchase of bed sheets, whereas loss on account of the purchase of infant weighing machine ..... on 07.11.2007 accompanied by sri k.l. dev, member secretary, representative of director-in- chief, health services and representative of cabinet vigilance participated in the meeting and a comparative statement in respect of price bids of six tenderers were prepared in presence of the constituents aforesaid of the committee and the members made their signatures and the deputy secretary ..... petitioner figures and further cognizance was taken by the learned special judge on 25.04.2014 under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the indian penal code and section 13 (1) (c) & 13(1)(d) r/w section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act.4. supplementary final form reveals that petitioner is the proprietor of m/s savitri sales and it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2007 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. British India Rolling Mills

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR302(Jhr)]

..... upon the oral evidences of its witnesses besides certain documents which includes certain correspondence exchanged between the plaintiff and the defendant, papers relating to tender notice and tender awarded to m/s agarwal iron and steel industries and also comparative statement of tenders received in response to the third lender notice. the ..... of mutual agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. the fact that the second tender floated by the plaintiff was only for 360 mt which corresponds to approximate quantity of left over materials under the first contract, in itself, does not sustain any definite link between the first contract and ..... of the contract, which was done even before the expiry of the period stipulated therein, the second contract was floated for 360 mt which corresponds almost to the left over quantity of scrap materials under the first contract. after the first contract was terminated on account of willful breach on ..... argues further that the trial court has misconstrued the law in the context and has failed to consider that under the provisions of section 73 of the contract act, the measure of damages would be the price prevailing on the date of breach of contract, is the price on which the ..... m/s agurwal iron and steel industries for much lesser amount, although the defendant had agreed in its meeting with the plaintiff in december 1983 to execute the contract at higher rate than what was offered by m/s agarwal iron and steel industries.on issue no. 1 regarding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2015 (HC)

P Pugalendi Puga Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Superintendent ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... and as such, he had signed the minutes (annexure-2 of the counter affidavit, dated 10.06.2015). in the said meeting, comparative price chart was prepared in which gramin vikas kendra, chaibasa had given lowest rate against supply of aldrin dust. (ii) it was submitted besides ..... with other government officials, in connivance with the proprietor of said fake firm, flouted the prescribed rules by accepting and signing the comparative tender chart and also by approving the lowest rate submitted by said fake firm and, thereby, siphoning the revenue and caused wrongful loss to ..... , 409, 201, 109, 120b of the indian penal code read with sections 5(2), 5(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947 corresponding to sections 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was registered.8. the investigation was carried out and sanction for prosecution ..... , the order of cognizance dated 10.02.2015 by which the learned special judge, vigilance, hazaribagh has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 109, 409, 120b of the indian penal code as also the entire criminal proceedings in connection with ..... the forest and environment department/ state exchequer.7. on the basis of detailed written report lodged by the then superintendent of police, vigilance bureau, patna, vigilance p.s. case no. 16 of 1995 under sections .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //