Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: karnataka Year: 2009 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.020 seconds)

Feb 13 2009 (HC)

South Indian Sugar Mills Association by Its Secretary, Sri K. Ranganat ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-13-2009

Reported in : ILR2009KAR2216; 2009(5)KarLJ302:2009(3)KCCR18242009(5)AIRKarR232:AIR2009NOC2878

..... .19. a reading of the aforesaid provision makes it clear that the state government was conferred with the power to fix the minimum price under the said act. but, the proviso the the said section made it clear that the minimum price so determined by the state government shall not exceed the minimum price payable by the occupier of a factory under ..... the price at which sugarcane may be brought or sold. the sugarcane (control) order, 1966 is a statutory order made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3, of the essential commodities act, 1955, investing the central government with the power to fix the price of sugarcane and direct payment thereof as also the power to regulate the movement of sugar ..... the state government to fix price by an executive order, the state has the right to fix the price of the sugar cane. in view of the provisions of sub-section (1) of clause 3 of the 1966 order, the central government can fix only the minim price of sugarcane and the same should be read also with the sub-clause ..... extracted. relevant provisions of the sugarcane act and the sugarcane order was also extracted. after a comparative reading of these provisions, it was held as under:61. the relevant provisions of the sugarcane (control) order show that it seeks to lay down the minimum guaranteed price of sugarcane to the sugarcane growers with a corresponding obligation on them to supply sugarcane to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (HC)

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... and mining leases respectively. however, this is made subject to such person satisfying the state government the conditions stipulated in the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the act. sub-section (2) of section 11 of the act deals with the situation when there are applicants even without a notification calling for grant of reconnaissance permit or prospecting licence or mining lease and ..... touchstone of the forest [conservation] rules, 2003 which by itself ensures not only protection of the forests but also the environmental protection from the ecological angle and also provides for corresponding regeneration of the forest wealth wherever the forest wealth is destroyed; that it is not open to this court to now examine the validity of such leases granted after obtaining ..... deputy conservator of forest, bellary informed that the area abound with many rare medicinal plants, peculiar to the area and some of which are classified as endangered species.block-6 comparing of an area of 426 ha. of forest land in ramandurga range was also visited. this notified area, again is not subjected to any mining activity, though in the vicinity ..... and ecology. the same view was taken by andhra pradesh high court in m/s. colorock pvt. ltd. vijaywada v/s the director of mines & geology, government of a.p., (1983) 3 andh lt 39; m/s. anupama minerals v/s union of india, air 1986 andh prqa 225; m/s yashwant stone works v/s state of u. p., air .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2009 (HC)

Mr. Aiman Ahamed Khan S/O. Dr. Shamshad A. Khan, Minor Represented by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-29-2009

..... , it is necessary for us to refer to relevant portion from the said judgment which reads thus:22. ... on a comparative study of the provisions of act 26 of 1986 and act 16 of 1988, the functions of the commissionerate and the functions of the state council well nigh are the same except to ..... by the kea and that they should allocate seats as per the fee fixation made by it (the fee fixation committee). in this regard, the correspondence made by the note trust through letters with the state government, are produced. the further case of the university is that the kea issued the ..... in law.30. another legal contention urged by the learned senior counsel is that exercise of power by the central government under section 3 of the ugc act, which act is enacted by parliament from entry 66 list-1 of vii schedule of the constitution of india is not subject to or controlled ..... which is the policy of the state government to discharge of their constitutional obligation towards the students of socially and educationally oppressed class and weaker sections of the society who have been neglected from ages who are in a disadvantageous position in the society and therefore the state government has to ..... the decision of the constitutional bench of the supreme court in the case of sanjeev coke mills v. bharath coke mills ltd. reported in : air 1983 sc 239, relied upon paragraph no. 11, he submits with reference to additional prayer of the educational institutions in the amendment application is not supported .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //