Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: kolkata Year: 1950

Apr 21 1950 (HC)

Ramesh Ch. Bhattacharjee and anr. Vs. Nagendra N. Mullick

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-21-1950

Reported in : AIR1951Cal435

..... case of hutchinson v. jauncey, (1950) l all e. r. 165 is clearly distinguishable because of the special language used in section 10, english landlord and tenant rent control act, 1949. there is no such comparable language used in our legislation of 1950 from which the 'necessary intendment' can be deduced. besides the scheme & context of the ..... desperate attempt was made to prove that the premises in suit are used for manufacturing purpose first by producing an agreement with electric supply corporation & then by some correspondence pending suit to show that it is to be regarded as a factory. in my judgment that does prove that the tenancy was taken for manufacturing evidence. ..... conveniently collects the different meanings attributed to those words 'building' & 'rebuilding' in vol. 1, pp. 346-356 under different acts lake settled land acts, metropolitan buildings act, finance act, prescription act, burial act, gasworks act, income-tax act, land clauses consolidation act, london building acts, public health acts etc. in my judgment, these authorities & decisions cannot determine the interpretation of the words 'building' & 'rebuilding' as used in ..... as elaborately as is possible. the advantage that he will get is also a matter which i have discussed as completely as possible. i will now discuss the comparative advantage or disadvantage of the tenant. [after discussing the evidence, his lordship took up issue 2.]23. issue 2. -- the whole amendment was an afterthought. originally .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //