Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: kolkata Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.033 seconds)

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

..... to show that the singur act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature which is set our hereunder : land acquisition act singur act a. state cannot acquire its own property. a. act providing for resumption of possession ..... act there is no provision for acquisition of land owned by the state. the singur act provides for payment of compensation directly to the lessee and to the allottees of the land and not to the owner of the land.530. he drew our attention to a comparative chart and provisions of the l.a. act and the singur act ..... to any acquisition of property. the privy council held that although mortgage was not expressly mentioned in item no. 21 of the provincial list (corresponding to entry 18 of list ii) it should be implied because it could not be accepted that so important a subject as mortgage was left ..... interpretation by ironing out of creases is totally different from the facts and circumstances of this case. the defect in the singur act is not at all comparable to the defect which was before lord denning in seafords case (supra) nor does such defect have any relevance in the context ..... in the case of hoechst pharmaceuticals ltd. & ors. vs. state of bihar & ors. reported in (1983) 4 scc 45 court held that for judging the validity of section 5(3) of the bihar finance act, 1981 (which levied a surcharge to be paid by a dealer) the court has to determine whether in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2012 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited and Others Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

..... to show that the singur act is within the legislative competence of the state legislature which is set our hereunder : land acquisition actsingur acta. ..... act there is no provision for acquisition of land owned by the state. the singur act provides for payment of compensation directly to the lessee and to the allottees of the land and not to the owner of the land. 518. he drew our attention to a comparative chart and provisions of the l.a. act and the singur act ..... related to any acquisition of property. the privy council held that although mortgage was not expressly mentioned in item no. 21 of the provincial list (corresponding to entry 18 of list ii) it should be implied because it could not be accepted that so important a subject as mortgage was left out ..... purposive interpretation by ironing out of creases is totally different from the facts and circumstances of this case. the defect in the singur act is not at all comparable to the defect which was before lord denning in seafords case (supra) nor does such defect have any relevance in the context ..... in the case of hoechst pharmaceuticals ltd. and ors. vs. state of bihar and ors. reported in (1983) 4 scc 45 court held that for judging the validity of section 5(3) of the bihar finance act, 1981 (which levied a surcharge to be paid by a dealer) the court has to determine whether in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //