Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: punjab and haryana Year: 2006

Jan 25 2006 (HC)

Dr. Satyawati Rana Vs. Dr. A.P. Singh Narang and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR182

..... in medicine) from the bhabha atomic research centre (barc) held by him is more relevant than doctorate in nuclear physics. it is submitted that in all corresponding posts elsewhere, a diploma in radiological physics is insisted upon and that, even in the state of andhra pradesh, all other physicists working in the line ..... a doctorate in nuclear physics has been prescribed. there is nothing prima facie preposterous about this requirements. it is not for us to assess the comparative merits of such a doctorate and the barc diploma held by the petitioner and decide or direct what should be the qualifications to be prescribed for ..... the relevant material before it. in sitting in appeal over the selection so made and in setting it aside on the ground of the so called comparative merits of the candidates as assessed by the court, the high court went wrong and exceeded its jurisdiction.likewise in j. ranga swamy's case ..... relevant factors, the court should be very slow to interfere with such recommendations (see: university of mysore v. c.d. gonida rao). in a more comparable situation in state of bihar v. dr. asis kumar mukherjee. this court observed as under: (s.c.c. p. 611, para 21)shri jagdish ..... by public service commission, aided by experts in the field, within the framework of regulations framed by the medical council of india under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956, and approved by the government of india on june 5, 1971. when selection is made by the commission aided and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2006 (HC)

Som Lal Vs. Vijay Laxmi

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-20-2006

Reported in : (2006)143PLR81a

..... the state election commission act, being later in time, section 208 of the panchayati raj act stands repealed by virtue of section 143(1) of the state election commission act, does not appear to be based upon sound legal principles. section 143(1) of the state election commission act provides that, 'the provisions of any state law corresponding to the provisions of this act, are hereby repealed ..... if he has been found guilty of any offence punishable under section 153a or section 171e or section 171f or section 376 or section 376a or section 376b or section 376c or section 376d or section 498a or section 505 of the indian penal code, 1860 or any offence punishable under chapter xiii of this act unless a period of six years has elapsed since the date ..... punjab panchayati raj act, is directly referable to part ix of the constitution and it has been ..... force or shade or meaning and thereafter to interpret the new act with analogous provision.24. having regard to these well known principles of construction of a statute and on a comparative examination of two sets of provisions contained in the 'panchayati raj act' and the 'state election commission act', it stands crystallized that the legislative scheme contained in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //