Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Court: rajasthan Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.024 seconds)

Jul 26 2006 (HC)

Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Association and ors. Vs. St ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-26-2006

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3400

..... of rs. 5500-10500 to the post of technical assistant. the government thereupon called for further details from the chief engineer who submitted a comparative chart of both the posts indicating the procedure for recruitment, minimum educational qualification, earlier pay scale, revised pay scale. the chief engineer vide letter ..... qualifications prescribed for appointment and the functional responsibilities and therefore commission recommended that these posts may be placed in the replacement scale of pay corresponding to rs. 2000-3599 in place of 1640- 2900. it was pursuant to acceptance of such recommendation of the fifth pay commissioner by ..... matters with restraint and interfere only when they are satisfied that the decision of the government is patently irrational, unjust and prejudicial to a section of employees and the government while taking the decision has ignored factors which are material and relevant for a decision in the matter. even ..... help of which he has contended that two posts were always in the similar scale of pay in the pay scale rules, 1969,1976, 1983, 1987 and 1989. it was for the first time that under the rules of 1998 the state government granted the scale of rs. ..... p.v. hariharan and anr. : [1997]2scr1050 while examining similar question, observed as under:it is the function of the government which normally acts on the recommendations of a pay commission. change of pay scale of a category has a cascading effect. several other categories similarly situated, as well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2006 (HC)

Prakash Chaturvedi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-03-2006

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2424; 2006(4)WLC515

..... 2005 in prof. yashpal's case (supra). it would be convenient to extract the objects and reasons as well as the comparative chart of the relevant provisions of chhatisgarh act, 2002 as amended upto 17.03.2004 and the rajasthan act, 2005:objects and reasonsculture and heritage is directly linked to the fundamental values of life provided by education, india an epitome ..... in case it (1) the state government, if it ishas become non- functional, for what- satisfied after considering the reportsoever reasons. submitted under sub-section (2) of section 5 of sub-section (1) of section 5 may, by notification in the official gazette, establish a university with such name, location, jurisdiction and with such conditions as may be specified in such ..... there is an 'irreconcilable' conflict between entries in the union list and the state list. reference be made to hotel pharmaceuticals ltd v. state of bihar air 1983 sc 1019 and india cement v. state of tamil nadu air 1990 sc 85. accordingly, the contention raised as to competence of rajasthan legislative assembly to enact the impugned ..... and research rsity act, 1985 (central act no.50 ofand offer continuing education pro- 1985);grammes; (d) 'distance education' means5. to create centres of excellence for education imported by combination ofresearch and development and for shar- any two or more means ofing knowledge and its application; communication, viz. broadcasting,6. to provide consultancy to the industry telecasting, correspondence courses,and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //