Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: comparative chart of corresponding sections of 1983 act Year: 1969

Mar 05 1969 (HC)

Narendra Sharma Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-05-1969

Reported in : [1970]75ITR781(Cal)

..... the corresponding provisions of the repealed act.14. in my view, this contention of dr. pal must be accepted. as is ..... clear from a comparative study of the two sections of the repealed act and the act with regard to the imposition of ..... not in pari materia with the corresponding provisions of section 271 of the act, the principles enunciated in the above decision of the supreme court have no application to the present case. he pointed out by a comparative analysis of section 28(1) of the repealed act and section 271 of the act that the provisions of section 271 of the act were much more onerous and burdensome than ..... it was pointed out, by a comparison of various provisions of the repealed act with the corresponding provisions of the new act, that the provisions for imposition of penalty under the act were more onerous and burdensome than those under the repealed act. hence, it was contended that the provisions of section 297(2)(g) should be struck down as infringing article 14 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Lekhraj Singh Vs. Ganga Sahai

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All253

..... between the andrn and the dravida subdivisions in narasammal v. balaramacharki, i mad, h. o. rep., 420. mr. mayne (section 35) then goes on to say that 'any one who compares the dayabhaga with the mitakshara will observe that the two works differ in the most vital points, and that they do so from ..... as to age, even in the case of those who belong to a different gotra from the adopter. modern practice in the native states seems to correspond to this.'87. in this state of authority, the course which the argument in this case has taken suggests the consideration of the question under the ..... weight of evidence. and the evidence produced is both oral and documentary. the date of the adoption is stated to be katik sudi 15, sambat 1923, corresponding to the 22nd november 1866, and the oral evidence on the point may be classified under two heads, that is, witnesses who depose as to their ..... to point out the change of law, for they say 'it is worth observing that in the limitation act of 1877, which superseded the act now under discussion, the language is changed. article 118 of 1877, which corresponds to article 129 of 1871, so far as regards setting aside adoptions, speaks of a suit to ..... obtain a declaration that an alleged adoption is invalid or never in fact took place', and assigns a different starting point to the time that is to run against it.' that starting point under the present act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //