Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 254 inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states Page 1 of about 899 results (0.164 seconds)

Dec 17 1992 (HC)

Chellamma Kamalamma and ors. Vs. Narayana Pillai Prabhakaran Nair

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1993Ker146

..... -- (1) if any provision of a law made by legislature of a state is repugnant to any provision of a law made by parliament which parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the ..... concurrent list, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made ..... constitution of india to the extent of provisions made in the hindu succession act in relation to wills, intestacy and succession, the same shall necessarily override to that extent the corresponding provisions in relation to the said subject matter as contained in the travancore nair act, etc. this is clear from article 254 of the constitution of india. article 254 (1) reads as follows: "article 254:-- inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2014 (HC)

Nallajerla Murali Krishna @ Mura Vs. the State of Telangana, Through P ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to what law prevails where there is inconsistency between laws made by parliament under articles 249 and 250 (power of parliament to legislate to a matter in the state list in the national interest and or during proclamation of emergency in operation), and laws made by the legislatures of states as follows: nothing in articles 249 and 250 shall restrict the power of the legislature of a state to make any law which under this constitution it has ..... of a state is repugnant to any provisions of a law made by parliament which parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing ..... conflict between the state legislation that received the assent of the president and the subsequent central legislation as to the case is triable by the court of sessions or triable by magistrate.7. in fact, article 254 of the constitution of india speaks on what law to prevail in case of inconsistency between the laws made by parliament and laws made by legislatures of the states. it says (1) if any provision of a law made by the legislature .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2007 (HC)

Rukmani College of Education Run by Rukmani Educational and Charitable ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2008(1)CTC545; AIR2008Mad127; 2008(3)AIRKarR210(FB); 2008(1)MLJ1217

..... the union parliament legislates with respect to the same subject. there ..... from various judgments:1. the state law does not become void and soon as ..... is only when the provisions of the state act are repugnant to that of central act that the provisions of state act have to give way to the provisions of central act. article 254 of the constitution of india deals with the situation where there is inconsistence between laws made by the parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states interpreting the principle of repugnancy contained in this article, following principles can be culled out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2004 (HC)

J. Papa Rao Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD855; 2004(2)ALT663

..... law made by the legislature of a state is repugnant to any provision of a law made by parliament which parliament is competent to enact, the law made by parliament, whether passed before or after the law made by the legislature of the state, shall prevail and the law made by the legislature of the state shall, to the extent of repugnancy, be void.'however, article 254 of constitution of india reads thus:'article 254 inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states:--(1) if any provision of law made ..... by the legislature of a state is repugnant to any provision of a law made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2004 (HC)

Rathinam Vs. State, Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Prohibition a ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(1)CTC516; 2005(101)ECC659

..... act 14 of 1982 by operation of article 254 of the constitution of india.4.8. a reference to article 254 of the constitution of india, in this context, is inevitable and the same reads as follows:article 254. inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states.-(1) if any provision of a law made by the legislature of a state is repugnant to any provision of a law made by parliament which parliament is competent to enact, or to any ..... provision of an existing law with respect to one ..... of the matters enumerated in the concurrent list, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by parliament, whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2020 (HC)

Smt Jayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the result of the operations conducted in a zone in order to determine the land revenue assessment. he also invited attention of the court that, article 254 of the constitution of india refers to 61 inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states. he further referred to chapter-iii of the klr act procedure of revenue officers. section 24 of the klr act deals with revenue officers ..... to be revenue courts a revenue officer, not below the rank of the tahsildar while exercising power under this act, or any other law for the time ..... the parties and learned amicus curiae, it is relevant to consider the provisions of article 246 of the constitution of india which reads as under:246. subject-matter of laws made by parliament and by the legislatures of states.- 87 (1) notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in list i in the seventh schedule .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 2000 (HC)

Rahul Dhaka Vikas Society and anr. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi154

..... the union parliament legislates with respect to the same subject. there ..... from various judgments :1. the state law does not become void as soon as ..... is only when the provisions of the state act are repugnant to that of central act that the provisions of state act have to give way to the provisions of central act. article 254 of the constitution of india deals with the situation where there is inconsistence between laws made by the parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states interpreting the principle of repugnancy contained in this article, following principles can be culled out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1998 (HC)

M/S. Birla Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Rajeshwar Mahato and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT83(HC),[1998(80)FLR985],(1999)ILLJ957Cal

..... any doubt whatsoever that the parliamentary act shall prevail.13. article 254 of the constitution of india reads thus :-'inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states (1) if any provision of a law made by the legislature of a state is repugnant to any provisions of a law made by parliament which parliament is competent to enact, or to any provision of an existing law with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the ..... concurrent list, then, subject to the provisions of clause (2), the law made by parliament ..... .9.80.12. the matter of legislation relating to industrial disputes falls within list iii of seventh schedule of the constitution of india. both the parliament and the state legislature, therefore, have legislative competence to enact a law. the state of west bengal has not enacted a separate law. it merely amended certain provisions of the industrial disputes act in the year 1980 and in respect of other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2019 (HC)

Chanderprabhu Jain College of Higher Education & School of Law & Anr. ...

Court : Delhi

..... state law does not become void as soon as the union parliament legislates with respect to the same subject. there ..... in this article, following principles can be culled out from various judgments : interpreting 1. the ..... only when the provisions of the state w.p.(c) no.8163/2019 page 25 of 33 act are repugnant to that of central act that the provisions of state act have to give way to the provisions of central act. article 254 of the constitution of india deals with the situation where there is inconsistence between laws made by the parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states the principle of repugnancy contained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2002 (HC)

Manicklal Verma and anr. Vs. Smt. Jamunadevi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant332; ILR2002KAR2347; 2002(4)KarLJ400

..... the present act has been brought into force after obtaining assent of the president of india on 23-5-1998. therefore, article 254(2) of the constitution of india comes into play which declares that:article 254. inconsistency between laws made by parliament and laws made by the legislatures of states.--(1) xxx xxx xxx.(2) where a law made by the legislature of a state with respect to one of the matters enumerated in the concurrent list contains any ..... provision repugnant to the provisions of an earlier la-v made by parliament or an existing law with respect to ..... that matter, then, the law so made .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //