Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2011 Page 10 of about 103 results (0.069 seconds)

Dec 12 2011 (TRI)

Mahanthi Lakshmana Rao and Another Vs. State Bank of India Rep. by Bra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2011

..... maturity of the policy is 6-09-2021. no paid up value or maturity benefits are available under the policy except the exemption under section 80 of the income tax act,1881. after the insurance policy is issued , premium cannot be refunded nor policy can be cancelled. without disclosing the pendency of complaint before the banking ombudsman, the appellants filed the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2011 (TRI)

Sri. Koduru Subba Reddy and Another Vs. Sri. Mamidi Janardhan Reddy an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-11-2011

..... party no.3 submitted that after completion of the house slab, another rs.10,00,000/- has to be given but the complainant failed to perform his part of the contract. opposite party no.3 submitted that the complainant is due an amount of rs.1,80,000/- towards foundation and rs.24,00,000/- towards completed house slabs, partitions and ..... be sustained. it is the opposite parties 1 and 2 i.e. land owners case that no consideration has been paid to them and that there is no privity of contract between the complainant and them and hence no deficiency in service can be attributed to them. they filed ex.b1, power of attorney by which the first opposite party represents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2011 (TRI)

M/S.Jana Harsha Estates Construction Pvt.Ltd., Rep by Its Chairman and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2011

..... appellants either cancelled her membership or allotment in writing. they did not refund the amount stating that she was irregular in payment and they were not bound to keep the contract alive. when they have been receiving the amounts, they cannot turn round and say that the complainant was irregular and did not pay the instalment amounts promptly. obviously when the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2011 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager, D.O. and Anoth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-24-2011

..... , vs. asha goel (smt) and another ? reported in (2001) 2 scc page 160 has held that ??the duty to disclose material fact continues right up to the conclusion of the contract and also implies any material alteration in the character of the risk which may take place between the proposal and its acceptance. if there are any mis-statements or suppression ..... obtained for the sum worth exceeding one crore rupees. the suppression of the fact in this regard is a material fact and it would go to the root of the contract invalidating it consequent upon which the respondent is not entitled to claim any amount under the insurance policy. 13. the respondent has suppressed the fact from the appellant insurance company ..... facts relating to the other party which would influence and have direct bearing upon the decision to proceed to form the contract. obiviously, the respondent and his deceased wife are supposed to declare the fact of their obtaining the other insurance policies from other insurance companies to the appellant insurance company so ..... the fact of their obtaining other insurance policies which were taken for such a huge sum assured as of `1,20,00,000/-. essentially, the parties are to an insurance contract are required to be fair as the principle of ubberima fides is applicable to both the insured and the insurer as one party does not have knowledge of the material .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 2011 (TRI)

Prasad Homes Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Devidas Chandak and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : May-25-2011

..... had invented a story that there was a collection boy to collect the instalments and that opposite party no.1 suddenly stopped deputing the boy to get over breach of contract. opposite party no.1 submitted that it does not have any office or branch at nizamabad as such maintaining a collection boy for collecting instalments does not arise. the legal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2011 (HC)

Thota Saidaiah and Another Vs. the Commissioner of Appeals and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-2011

..... (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) regulation, 1969 (regulation i/1969) the word "tenant" means a person who holds cultivable land of another person, and is, or but for a special contract would be, liable to pay rent for such to such other person and includes an absolute occupancy tenant, occupancy tenant and ordinary tenant and a village service tenant. every tenant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2011 (TRI)

Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Personal Department and Others Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2011

..... in the accident and secondly the negligence of the doctors of the appellant hospital as also the effect of their negligence in administering the treatment to the first respondent in contract to the subsequent treatment that the first respondent had undergone at the hospital of the respondent no.2 and the nims. 23. the learned counsel for the appellant hospital has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2011 (TRI)

Mittapalli Amaralinga Ramakrishnaiah Vs. the S.B.i. Life Insurance Com ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Mar-16-2011

..... said decision the complainant preferred the appeal contending that the dist. forum did not appreciate the facts or law in correct perspective. exclusion clause is not part and parcel of contract. due to erroneous interpretation of terms the claim was dismissed which in fact he was entitled to, and therefore prayed that the complaint be allowed. 9) the point that arises ..... health declaration in ex. b2. therefore it cannot be said that she was not aware of the terms. even otherwise she ought to have noticed the terms, being part of contract. 11) it is not in dispute that the policyholder died within 45 days of commencement of risk. we reproduce condition no. 6 under the heading ??benefit printed under schedule-ii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2011 (TRI)

Bhusireddy Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. the Branch Manager Lic of Branch Offi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-08-2011

..... % as was used to be awarded on the amount awarded as compensation in motor vehicle accident claims. the complaint is filed by virtue of the insurance policy which is a contract whereunder the respondent corporation assured the insured that it would pay a sum of rs.5 lakh on happening of any of the events mentioned therein. compared to the contractual .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2011 (TRI)

United India Insurnace Company Ltd. Vs. Gurunadha Swamy Rice Industrie ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-18-2011

..... . while so on 28.3.2007 one of the feeder ejectors (84 nos) failed and was not working and the same was informed to service engineer which has annual maintenance contract (amc). he inspected the machine and opined that three feeders were failed and asked to replace immediately. the said fact was informed to the insurance company enclosing the inspection report .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //