Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: andhra pradesh Year: 2011 Page 3 of about 103 results (0.212 seconds)

Mar 23 2011 (HC)

M/S. V.V.S. Constructions, and ors. Vs. M/S.ivrcl Infrastructure, and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

..... sub-contract), nominated by managing director of ivrcl. the award of the arbitrator so nominated shall be final conclusive and binding on all parties to the dispute. the venue of arbitration is ..... its managing director shall be the sole arbitrator. the said clause reads as under: "clause 28. disputes: in the event of any dispute arising out of this sub- contract, the parties hereto agree that the matter shall be referred to the sole arbitrator who is the officer of m/s.ivrcl infrastructures & projects limited (other than concerned with this ..... no counter-affidavit is filed, the learned counsel for the respondent at the outset raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the application. while relying upon ace pipeline contracts (p) ltd. v. bharat petroleum corpn limited1, the learned counsel contended that the only remedy available to the applicant is to prefer an appeal under section 34 of the ..... . k. anantha kumari2, vehemently contended that the application is maintainable under section 11 (6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. 6. it is not disputed before this court that as per the arbitration clause contained in the special conditions of contract, subject to which the work order was issued to the applicant, the officer of the respondent company as nominated by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2011 (HC)

M/S. V.V.S. Constructions, Engineering Contratrors Vs. M/S.ivrcl Infra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

..... sub-contract), nominated by managing director of ivrcl. the award of the arbitrator so nominated shall be final conclusive and binding on all parties to the dispute. the venue of arbitration is ..... its managing director shall be the sole arbitrator. the said clause reads as under:"clause 28. disputes: in the event of any dispute arising out of this sub- contract, the parties hereto agree that the matter shall be referred to the sole arbitrator who is the officer of m/s.ivrcl infrastructures & projects limited (other than concerned with this ..... no counter-affidavit is filed, the learned counsel for the respondent at the outset raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the application. while relying upon ace pipeline contracts (p) ltd. v. bharat petroleum corpn limited1, the learned counsel contended that the only remedy available to the applicant is to prefer an appeal under section 34 of the ..... . k. anantha kumari2, vehemently contended that the application is maintainable under section 11 (6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996.7. it is not disputed before this court that as per the arbitration clause contained in the special conditions of contract, subject to which the work order was issued to the applicant, the officer of the respondent company as nominated by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Kapil Chit Funds Pvt.Ltd., Rep. by Chief Manager Vs. Sri G. Surya ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

..... the payment of due instalments of k.ashok kumar is also liable to pay the said due amount jointly and severally along with other guarantors u/sec. 128 of indian contract act. the liability of surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor and his liability is immediate. the complainant suppressed the fact that he stood as surety to pay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2011 (TRI)

Housing Development Finance Corporation (Hdfc) Rep. by Its Deputy Gene ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jan-27-2011

..... . it was entitled to recover the amount. it is entitled to retain the documents till the amount was discharged by virtue of bankers lien in terms of section 171 of contract act. therefore it prayed for dismissal of the complaint with costs. 4) the complainant in proof of his case filed his affidavit evidence and got exs. a1 to a5 marked while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2011 (HC)

Lakkoji Mohana Rao, So. Late Annayya, a Vs. 1. Lakkoji Viswanadham, So ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-2011

..... authority or any civil court and an award by an arbitrator directing a partition (and a memorandum regarding past partition)". section 17 of the registration act reads as follows : "documents of which registration is compulsory -(1) the following documents shall be registered, if the property to which they relate ..... in a suit for specific performance or as evidence of part performance of a contract for the purpose of section 53-a of the transfer of property act or as evidence of any collateral transaction not required to be ..... unregistered document affecting immovable property and required by this act or the transfer of property act, 1882 (4 of 1882), to be registered may be received as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance under chapter ii of the specific relief act, 1877 (1 of 1877) or as evidence of ..... affected by registration of instrument.25. the a.p. amendment act 17 of 1986 came into force with ..... act, no document required by section 17 to be registered shall be received as evidence of any transaction affecting the said property unless it has been registered. of course the proviso says that an unregistered document affecting immovable property and required to be registered, may be received as evidence of a contract .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2011 (HC)

K.Sajjan Raj Vs Gopisetty Chandramouli

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-23-2011

..... necessary sanction of the government was also in writing signed by the officer concerned. it has further to be held that the terms of the contract can be fairly deduced from the recitals of this document." 25.in that case, the lessee had taken possession in part performance of the agreement ..... because the plaintiff did not file rejoinder that will not amount to an admission. it is also his submission that after amendment of the registration act by act 4 of 1999, agreement of lease must be registered one and if not registered, such agreement of lease is invalid. it is also ..... seeking permission and the appellant was put in possession of the property and in the above circumstances, protection available under section 53a of the t.p. act came to be discussed. admittedly, the plaintiff was given possession of the flat, then she had also applied to the society for membership. she ..... the talukdari settlement officer continued to receive the rents. however, the agreement of lease was not registered. section 53 of the transfer of property act came to be considered in that case. the issue was whether the transfer could be ascertained with reasonable certainty. ex.181 is the resolution, ..... the fresh lease agreement. it is also his submission that an unregistered agreement of lease is admissible in evidence under section 49 of the registration act as evidence of part performance. in support of his contention, he has relied on the judgment in case between maneklal mansukhbhai v. hormutsji jamshedji .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2011 (TRI)

Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Jul-28-2011

..... there is no statutory liability on the insurance company and that the statutory liability is under workmen compensation act and it is on the employer and the policy is a matter of contract between the insurance company and the insured. section 4 of the policy (ex.b1) under the heading ..... force in the contention of the opposite party that it is the insured who has to seek settlement of the claim under the workmen compensation act and claim reimbursement from the insurance company. therefore we are of the considered view that the repudiation by the appellants/opposite parties is justified. ..... the company shall indemnify the insured against the legal liability under workmen compensation act ? in respect of the death or bodily injury (other than the paid driver) exceeding six in number. there is no liability under this ..... apply to imt 28. this clause reads as follows: ??the company shall indemnify the insured against the insureds legal liability under the workmens compensation act i.e. the insured has to satisfy the amount if any and then approach the insurance company for indemnification. imt 39 reads as follows ?? ..... the district forum has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint and it should have been filed before the commissioner of labour under workmen compensation act. the opposite party submits that as per the policy conditions only the owner/driver is eligible for personal benefits and the liability of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2011 (HC)

M/S.Svpcl Limited Vs. Securities Exchange Board of India Rep.by Its Ch ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-2011

..... the appeal filed by the petitioner, the securities appellate tribunal held that section 73(5) of the companies act postulates deemed rejection and that as no appeal under section 73(1a) of the companies act r/w section 22-a of the securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956 was preferred by the petitioner against the deemed refusal by the nse, the entire public issue has ..... failed. respondent no.1 referred to the correspondence exchanged between it and the petitioner in relation to the latter's liability for payment and interest, and observed that under section 73(2) of the companies act, the petitioner is ..... to file the writ petition questioning the show-cause notice itself. 7. opposing the above contentions, sri s.r.ashok, learned senior counsel, submitted that section 11 of the sebi act enumerates the functions of respondent no.1, which inter alia include the responsibility to protect the interests of the investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to ..... having collected the application fees within the said expression with a view to check the irregularities that may be indulged in by such companies. under section 11a of the sebi act, on which, strong reliance was placed by the learned senior counsel, respondent no.1 is empowered to make regulations with respect to the matters relating to issue of capital, transfer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2011 (TRI)

Yadagir Shanganti Vs. Radiant Infosystems Pvt. Ltd.Rep. by Its Directo ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Sep-29-2011

..... necessary equipment would be supplied besides imparting training in management and operation of rajiv portal for service channel purpose and other 64 services. despite the fact that he fulfilled his contract by taking kiosk on rent, purchasing furniture and fixtures and paying salaries to the staff, however, the respondents did not provide the equipment amounting to deficiency in service, and ..... therefore he prayed that the complaint be allowed. 9) during the course of hearing of the appeal, r3 filed a photostat copy of contract entered into by it with bel (r2) marked as ex. b1. 10) the points that arise for consideration are: i) whether the complainant is a consumer, and the agreement ..... while the respondents filed their affidavit evidence, and did not file any document. 7) the dist. forum after considering the evidence placed on record opined that for the project contract entered into between them he should seek specific performance by filing a suit. there is no deficiency in service on the part of respondents, and therefore dismissed the complaint. 8 ..... technology which itself excludes the argument that it was for commercial purpose and excludes the case of the complainant from the provisions of the consumer protection act. see section 2(1)(d)(ii) of consumer protection act. 12). not only in the said pamphlet but also in various other documents relied upon by the complainant, especially project information document, the complainant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Sathyam Associates, Rep. by Its Managing Partner P. Rama Krishna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on : Aug-10-2011

..... and therefore the complainant has to pay the consumption charges as per the rates fixed by the authorities i.e. minimum charges of 80% of contracted maximum demand. (cmd) i.e. minimum 50 units per kva per month or actual consumption charges which ever is higher. the opp.party has ..... is open to the complainant to approach the electricity tribunal under section 49 c and 49(1) of indian electricity (andhra pradesh amendment ) act,2000 and the period spent in the wrong forum will be excluded while determining the limitation. in the result this appeal is dismissed and consequently ..... (5) any case pending before any court or other authority immediately before the commencement of the indian electricity (andhra pradesh amendment) act,2000, as would have been within the jurisdiction of a special tribunal shall stand transferred to the special tribunal, having jurisdiction as if the cause ..... gazette, specify for a district or districts, a court of district and sessions judge to be special tribunal to try the offences under this act and determine the compensation to be awarded to the electricity utility where the compensation to be awarded is upto the value of rupees five lakhs; ..... consumer as he owns a factory manufacturing aqua feed. the contention of the respondents/opposite parties is that as per indian electricity (andhra pradesh amendment) act 2000 which came in force on 31.7.2000 constituted special tribunal under section 49 c which reads as follows: ??49-c: (1).constitution .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //