Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: appellate tribunal for electricity aptel Year: 2011 Page 5 of about 42 results (0.035 seconds)

Feb 14 2011 (TRI)

Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking, Mumbai Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Feb-14-2011

..... of the above provision would clearly reveal that the state commission has unhindered powers to issue necessary directions as against the licensee to ensure compliance of the provisions of the act, regulations and the conditions of the license. 26. that apart, another section 142, which is pointed out confers power upon the state commission to issue penal directions for ..... any contravention of the provisions of the act. section 142 is reproduced as under: section 142: punishment for non-compliance of directions by appropriate commission. in case any complaint is filed before the appropriate commission by any ..... the state commission was approached by the respondents nos.3 to 8 consumers complaining against tata power company limited, respondent no.2 alleging contravention of section 43 of the act as well as contravention of its license conditions by tata power company limited under which tata power company limited is obliged to supply electricity to consumers in its license area ..... share its wide network with the tata power company limited. at the same time, the state commission ruled that tata power company limited, respondent no.2 was obliged under the act, 2003 to develop and maintain efficient, coordinated and economical distribution system in its area of supply. accordingly, a specific direction has been issued by the state commission to tata .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2011 (TRI)

M/S. Jayaswal Neco, Industries Ltd, Raipur Vs. Chhattisgarh Electricit ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Feb-18-2011

..... power in open market. 10. the points for consideration are as follows: (i) whether the commission passed the impugned order in contravention of the principles established under the electricity act, 2003, national electricity policy as well as the orders passed by this tribunal from time to time? (ii) whether the commission erred in ignoring the fact that the total ..... the status of captive generating plants, which will entitle them to affect supply to third parties without obtaining a distribution license or without availing open access as mandated under the act, 2003. thus, these would gradually cripple the operation of the respondent no. 2, still burdened with the statutory universal supply obligation, by leaving mostly the subsidized category of ..... before this tribunal are accepted, then by resorting to mechanism such as the lease mechanism: in the present case or in the case of m/s monnet ispat, and acting under the camouflage of an impermissible mechanism of combining self consumption from their own generating plants with the consumption as captive user of another generating plant, generating plants would attain ..... jnil, but it cannot be combined with the consumption of electricity generated by another plant. 3. on 23rd september, 2009 the commission issued notices under section 142 of the act against the appellant and two other generating companies in connection with the aforesaid petition no. 17 of 2008 (m) alleging that self consumption of electricity by the appellant and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //