Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: gujarat state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc ahmedabad Page 1 of about 3 results (0.084 seconds)

May 05 1990 (TRI)

Consumer Education and Research Society Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad

..... bank shall be a body corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal with power, subject to the provisions of this act, to acquire, hold and dispose of property, and to contract, and may sue and be sued in its name". we, therefore, accept the argument of mr. mishra that the ..... sully, within the district of cardiff registry, under the defendant company which had its principal and registered office in piccadilly, london. the labourer contracted dermatitis and the court issued a writ against the company in the cardiff district registry. the question arose if, within the meaning of order ..... examine the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 under which the existing banks shown in the schedule including canara bank, were nationalised and were resignated as corresponding new banks. under the provisions ..... 20 of the code, why the same provisions cannot be made applicable to the corporation especially when such a discrimination has been removed by the consumer act. mr. mishra has argued his case on the basis that the opposite party, namely, canara bank, is a corporation. we may, therefore, ..... or partly within the territory of gujarat and, therefore, the commission has no jurisdiction within the meaning of section 11(2) of the consumer act. (4) the learned officer of complainant no. 1 association, mr. saraf, has submitted that the canara bank has a divisional office at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2012 (TRI)

Giriraj Proteins Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Court : Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad

..... the practices included therein. the opponent insurance company being governmental instrumentality is ??state under article 12 of the constitution of india and it is duty bound to act in a just fair and reasonable manner. the insurance company ought to pay the insurance amount which is due and payable according to them to the insured ..... 237 (nc), wherein honble national commission held that without any plausible explanation, certificate of bank cannot be said to have been manipulated and that surveyor can be ignored if acted arbitrarily. second authority cited by mr. pancholi is the case of smt. nitharika maurya v. chief manager, new india assurance co. and ors., ii (2011) ..... signature on full and final settlement voucher amounts to an unfair trade practice on the part of insurers. section 2(1) (r) of the consumer protection act 1986 defines the ??unfair trade practice which means a trade practice which for the purpose of promoting the sale, use or for provision of any service adopts ..... be, the courts will not enforce, and will when called upon to so, strike down as unfair and unreasonable clause in a contract entered into between the parties who are not equal in bargaining power. in the case of oriental insurance company ltd. v. government tool room and ..... 1986) 3 scc 156, honble supreme court has held that where a man has no choice or rather no meaningful choice but to give consent to contract or sign on the dotted line in prescribed or other forum or to accept set of rules as part of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2011 (TRI)

Niranjanbhai T. Parekh and Others Vs. Ajaybhai Harshadbhai Shah

Court : Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad

..... 1995) 3 scc 583, has clearly spelt out the status of consumer fora inter alia stating that the quasi judicial bodies/authorities/agencies created by the act known as district forum, state commission and the national commission are not courts though invested with some of the powers of a civil court. they are ..... . the complainants purpose of floating the scheme was to earn profits. the complainants therefore is not ??consumer as defined under section 2(d) of the act. the complainant no. 4 has cancelled the power of attorney of first complainant because of certain dispute in regard to sharing of the profits, etc. ..... and services purchased and availed by them in a market dominated by large trading and manufacturing bodies. indeed the entire act revolves round the consumer and is designed to protect his interest. the act provides for ??business to consumer disputes and not ??business to business disputes. in a recent case of milan barot ..... s.a. makhija, member: 1. this complaint is filed under the provisions of the consumer protection act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the act or c.p. a. for the sake of brevity). 2. the short facts of the complainants case are that the complainants ..... had their own plot no. 70-a at bhavnagar, details of which are given in para-2 of the complaint. the complainants decided to float a scheme of flats on their plots and as such they had given contract .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //