Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1974 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.015 seconds)

Sep 18 1974 (HC)

Bal Krishan Vaid Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-18-1974

..... in a college affiliated to the university of saugar and managed by a governing body established under the provisions of an ordinance made under the university of saugar act. the appellant was under contract with the governing body. the principal of the college framed charges against the appellant andthereafter the governing body terminated his services. it was contended that the governing body ..... the central government to revise any order made by the state government or other authority in exercise of the powers conferred on it by or under the act. when the order terminating the contract has not been made in the exercise of statutory power, the remedy by way of revision under section 30 cannot be availed of by the petitioner.12. the ..... examined by the court only if a writ could issue for such breach. and as regards the contention that section 4-a (2) of the act cannot be invoked in support of the termination of the contract, it appears unnecessary to enter into that question because ex facie the impugned notice purports to have been issued under clause 30 of the agreement ..... that notice in this writ petition it is not necessary for the government to have recourse to section 4-a (2) of the act.15. then there is the submission of the petitioner that the termination of his contract by the government is mala fide and has been occasioned by the ill-will of the sixth respondent. if the government has terminated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1974 (HC)

Surjit Singh Vs. Pritam Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-1974

..... much less public policy, and therefore the agreement was neither illegal nor unlawful nor did it affect the provisions of any law within the meaning of section 23 of the contract act. as regards bhagat ram v. smt. lilawati galib, ilr (1972) 1 him pra 345 = (air 1972 him pra 125) placed before us by the learned ..... landlord to let to any person accommodation which has fallen vacant or is about to fall vacant was not void under sections 12 and 23 of the contract act. the case is clearly distinguishable. it did not raise a question of fixing the fair rent which, as it seems to me, binds future landlords and ..... was granted to the tenant to vacate the premises. by that time the new act of 1971 had come into force and section 14 of that act was pleaded as a bar to ejectment it was held by me that the tenant could contract out of that condition and he was bound to vacate after the expiry of ..... bench decision of that court of which the report is air 1964 all 1 (fb). a contract of tenancy was entered into in violation of order under section 7 (2) of the u. p. act. it was held that the contract of tenancy was valid and was not forbidden bv law. none of the provisions of the ..... act was defeated because of such an agreement culminating in the contract of tenancy. in this manner the compromise independent of the act was held valid and binding between the parties.34. yet another full bench decision of jammu and kashmir high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 1974 (HC)

Bansilal Vs. Kanshi Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-19-1974

..... sc 838 (supra) and ferozi lal jain air 1970 sc 794 (supra) belong. accordingly, as the order is a nullity it is not an order under the act and therefore, not an order covered by section 15 (41. it is open to the tenant to question it in a court of law. the learned district ..... singh v. muni subrat, 1969 ren cr 151 (sc), the supreme court considered the comparable provisions of section 13 (11 of the delhi and ajmer land control act, 1952 and held that a decree directing the tenant to deliver possession on the basis of an award, which was not made on the basis of a statutory ..... eviction was sought and, therefore, the order of the rent controller is a nullity in my opinion, the tenant is right.9. section 13 of the act directs that no tenant shall be evicted except in accordance with the provisions of that section to evict the tenant the landlordmust apply to the controller for an ..... landlord and tenant between the parties was not in dispute, that the order dated july 29, 1970, of the rent controller was made under section 13 of the act and, therefore, by virtue of section 15 (4) the order could not be called in question in a court of law. he has held that the ..... december 1, 1969 the landlord of shop no. 243. chowk bazar, solan, filed an application under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') for the eviction of the tenant from the shop on may 25, 1970 the rent controller framed a number of issues. before any evidence could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1974 (HC)

Kailash Wati and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-1974

..... .18. the third do in is about theinterest.19. the learned claims tribunal did not allow any interest on the amount of compensation. section 110-cc of the motor vehicles act provides for award of interest where any claim is allowed. the section says that the tribunal may direct that in addition to the amount of compensation simple interest shall also ..... the fruit of services rendered by an employee in the past. it was in the nature of deferred wages payable under a contract of employment for past services. therefore just as the amounts received by an injured under a contract of insurance were not deductible, the amount, disablement pension, received by an employee were also not deductible.'a similar view has been ..... chet ram thakur, j.1. these four appeals arise out of four claims petitions under section 110-a of the motor vehicles act disposed of by the motor accident claims tribunal, mahasu and kinnaur districts at kelleston, simla by a single judgment, dated 3lst august, 1971.2. the undisputed facts of the cases .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //