Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.024 seconds)

Dec 15 1992 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kavita Rani and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-1992

Reported in : I(1993)ACC606,1993ACJ489

..... xxx xxx(b) where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of, or in pursuance of, a contract of employment,-(i) in respect of persons other than passengers carried for hire or reward, a limit of fifty thousand rupees in all;(ii) in respect of ..... xxx xxx xxx(b) where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers are carried for hire or reward or by reason of or in pursuance of a contract of employment, in respect of persons other than passengers carried for hire or reward, a limit of twenty thousand rupees; and in respect of passengers a ..... excluding the driver;the words 'twenty thousand' in clause (b) aforementioned were substituted with words 'fifty thousand'.12. by virtue of section 54 of the amendment act no. 56 of 1969, which came into force on and from 2nd march, 1970, clause (b) was substantially amended and it stood after amendment as under:95 ..... , in relation to liability under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, the company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other than a passenger carried by reason of or in pursuance of a contract of employment) being carried in or upon or entering or mounting or alighting ..... from the motor vehicle at the time of the occurrence of the event out of which any claim arises.(d) xxx xxx xxx11. the relevant clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act, as it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 1992 (HC)

Khem Singh and ors. Vs. the State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-05-1992

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3848

..... as not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and it must be such as to show that within all probability the act must have been done by the accused and the accused alone.(see also rahim beg v. state of u.p., 1972 scc (cri) 827 : (1972 cri lj 1260) and jagta ..... not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and it must be such as to show that within all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.20. it is also relevant to refer to kishore chand v. state of h.p. air 1990 sc 2140 where in paras 4 ..... of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.17. further, in prem thakur v. state of punjab, air 1983 sc 61 : (1983 cri lj 155), chief justice y. v. chandrachud, speaking ..... not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and it must be such as to show that within all human probability the act must have been done by the accused.16. again, in sharad birdhi chand sharda v. state of maharashtra, air 1984 sc 1622 : (1984 cri lj 1738) the apex court said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1992 (HC)

Ranbir Singh and ors. Vs. Gita Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-04-1992

Reported in : AIR1993HP43

..... containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed, but subject to the provisions of the indian evidence act, 1872 (1 of 1872), oral evidence of its contents shall not be received. explanation -- for the purposes of this section -- (a) an acknowledgment may be sufficient ..... written authority need not be there to constitute a duly authorised agency in favour of a person as contemplated under section 18 of the limitation act 1963. from the conduct of the parties and from the other surrounding circumstances, it can and must necessarily be inferred as to whether there ..... also liability of redemption of mortgage by the mortgagors whereby the period of limitation for redemption of mortgage stood extended as provided under section 18 of the limitation act. (please also see: suraj bakhsh v. ganga bakhsh, air 1927 oudh 457; sheo prasad v. rama kant, air 1948 oudh 257, arjan singh ..... mortgage and liability of its redemption by the mortgagors which extends the period of limitation for redemption of mortgage under section 18 of the limitation act.7. there is no dispute that mutation no. 6, a copy whereof is ex.p-a on record, pertains to the mortgage in question ..... and mst. khairi mortgagor all have signed the said report and acknowledged the factum of mortgage and this suit under section 18 of indian limitation act is within limitation.'4. civil revision no. 31 of 1971 filed in this court by the appellants-defendants challenging the order dated 6-7- .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //