Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract act 1872 Court: madya pradesh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc bhopal Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.025 seconds)

May 18 2011 (TRI)

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pushpa Singh

Court : Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Bhopal

Decided on : May-18-2011

..... provided that a stage carriage permit shall, subject to any conditions that may be specified in the permit, authorize the use of the vehicle as a contract carriage: provided further that a stage carriage permit may, subject to any conditions that may be specified in the permit, authorize the use of the vehicle ..... of honble apex court referred to above (supra). though two-member bench of this commission, in a similar matter of violation of provisions of m.v. act, 1988 for plying vehicle without valid fitness certificate held repudiation of claim to be valid, however, as company was willing to grant insured amount on an ..... as reflected by exs. d/7, 8 and 9, the insurance company repudiated their liability to pay the damages. 3. section 66 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 provides for necessity for permits and sub-section (1) lays down as under: ??66. necessity for permits ??(1) no owner of a motor vehicle ..... act or some other act. it is not the case of the insurance company that the policy is a statutory policy. it is further stated in para 14: ..... 2007) cpj 347 (nc), observed that the alleged breach of not having the permit was with regard to the provisions of motor vehicles act. therefore, the question would be whether the insurance company can repudiate the claim on the alleged ground of breach of some provisions of the motor vehicles .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //