Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: allahabad lucknow Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.018 seconds)

May 14 2015 (HC)

Raeesul Hasan and Another Vs. State of U.P. Through Secy. Education an ...

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

Decided on : May-14-2015

dr. d.y. chandrachud, c.j. the present reference to the full bench was made by a learned single judge of this court on 20 december 2006; the issue referred for adjudication being as follows: "which date will be relevant for the purpose of determination of criteria of availability and eligibility for promotion to the post of lecturer grade i.e. the date on which vacancy occurs to forward to the selection committee/commission or the first day of year of the recruitment when the vacancy is notified for recruitment?" the uttar pradesh secondary education (services selection board) act, 1982 established a board for the selection of teachers in institutions recognised under the intermediate education act, 1921. the statement of objects and reasons appended to the introduction of the bill in the state legislature furnished the following rationale for the constitution of a statutory board: "the appointment of teachers in secondary institutions recognised by the board of high school and intermediate education was governed by the intermediate education act, 1921 and regulations made thereunder. it was felt that the selection of teachers under the provisions of the said act and the regulations was some times not free and fair. besides, the field of selection was also very much restricted. this adversely affected the availability of suitable teachers and the standard of education. it was therefore, considered necessary to constitute secondary education service commission at the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2015 (HC)

State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Home and Others Vs. Rajendr ...

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

Decided on : May-11-2015

dr. d.y. chandrachud, c.j. the issue on 7 november 2012, a division bench referred the following question of law for resolution by the full bench: "whether a temporary police constable appointed under section 2 of the police act 1861 (police act), who has not been placed on probation, can be terminated from service in accordance with the uttar pradesh temporary government servants (termination of service) rules, 1975 (police regulation) or whether the procedure provided under para 541 of the police regulations dealing with the constables on probation shall be applicable" the issue before the full bench, turns upon the interpretation of the provisions of the police act and of the police regulations. the issue is whether a person, who has been appointed as a police constable on a temporary basis, is entitled to the benefit of regulation 541 of the police regulations. the constables who are before this court, contend that the services of a person who is appointed on a temporary basis, can be dispensed with only in accordance with the procedure prescribed by regulation 541. contrary to this, is the position which has been adopted by the state, which is that the services of a person who has been appointed on a temporary basis are not governed by regulation 541 which applies only to probationers, and that the rules framed by the state under article 309 of the constitution, called the uttar pradesh temporary government servants (termination of service) rules, 1975 (rules of 1975) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2015 (HC)

Ashish Kumar Misra (Advocate) [P.I.L.] Vs. Bharat Sarkar Thru. Sachiv ...

Court : Allahabad Lucknow

Decided on : Apr-15-2015

the petition has been filed in the public interest by a practising advocate in order to raise two concerns relating to the issuance of ration cards under the national food security act, 20131. the first issue relates to the validity of the provisions of section 13 of the act on the ground that the statutory provision while recognizing the eldest woman member as the head of the household does not contemplate a situation where there may be no woman in the family. in order to appreciate this grievance, we extract hereinbelow the provisions of section 13 of the act: "13. women of eighteen years of age or above to be head of household for purpose of issue of ration cards.- (1) the eldest woman who is not less than eighteen years of age, in every eligible household, shall be head of the household for the purpose of issue of ration cards. (2) where a household at any time does not have a woman or a woman of eighteen years of age or above, but has a female member below the age of eighteen years, then, the eldest male member of the household shall be the head of the household for the purpose of issue of ration card and the female member, on attaining the age of eighteen years, shall become the head of the household for such ration cards in place of such male member." section 13 forms part of chapter vi of the act which has a provision for the empowerment of women. stipulating that the eldest woman of every eligible household, above the age of eighteen, shall be the head of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //