Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: allahabad Year: 1946 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.018 seconds)

Feb 13 1946 (PC)

NaraIn Sahai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-1946

Reported in : AIR1946All333

..... on bail but guarantees the attendance of that person. he is a surety for attendance and not a surety for payment of money. his contract and the contract of the person released on bail are independent of each other. the simple fact is that the surety promises to pay a certain sum o ..... which it connotes under the law of contract. under this proviso even though the bond is not given by the minor bound over and is executed by the surety as the principal promisor he, nevertheless ..... minor, the bond shall be executed only by his sureties.the reason for this proviso is no doubt the incapacity of a minor to enter into a contract, but this proviso puts it beyond doubt that the word 'surety' in chap. 8, criminal p.c., is not used in the limited sense ..... sections of that code be influenced or coloured by reference to the highly technical and at times artificial rules relating to civil liability enforceable under an ordinary contract of guarantee.5. the provisions contained in the code do, to my mind, show that the sureties, by their bond, guarantee that the person ..... taken to insure the accomplishment of that object and not primarily with a view to bring into existence engagements or contracts involving a pecuniary liability. a 'contract of guarantee' is defined by section 126, contract act, asa contract to perform the promise, or discharge the liability, of a third person in case of his default.this definition .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1946 (PC)

Babu Kishan Chand Vs. Habib Ullah

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-08-1946

Reported in : AIR1946All448

..... factory and to persons employed (otherwise than in a factory) upon any railway by a railway administration or, either directly or through a sub-contractor, by a person fulfilling a contract with a railway administration.(5) the provincial government may after giving three months' notice of its intention of so doing, by notification in the official gazette, extend the provisions of ..... in sub-section (vi) of section 2 and is as follows:'wages' means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled, be payable, whether conditionally upon the regular attendance, good work or conduct or other behaviour of the person employed, or otherwise, to a ..... . sub-section (vi) of section 2, payment of wages act, says:'wages' means all remuneration, capable of being expressed in terms of money, which would, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled be payable, whether conditionally upon the regular attendance, good work or conduct or other behaviour of the person employed, or otherwise, to a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1946 (PC)

Sheikh Mohammad Vs. Mt. Rukmina Kunwar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-1946

Reported in : AIR1946All506

..... -8-1937 against mt. rukmina kuer and others who are some of the opposite parties, in the present revision. the suit was, inter alia, for specific performance of an alleged contract of sale. prior to the institution, of the suit viz., on 28-10-1936, rukmina kuer had filed an application under the encumbered estates act, which application has been, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1946 (PC)

Hajie Saeed and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-11-1946

Reported in : [1947]15ITR51(All)

pathak, j. - this is a reference made under section 66 (3) of the indian income-tax act before its amendment in 1939 by the commissioner of income-tax. the question which has been referred to this court for decision is as follows :-'whether, in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the relevant rules framed by the central board of revenue, the income-tax officer was legally competent to refuse the renewal of registration of the assessee firm for the assessment year 1939-40 when the firm had been duly registered under section 26a of the act and renewal of registration had been granted in previous years.'the material facts giving rise to this reference are very short and may be stated thus. three brothers, haji mohammad rafi, haji mohammad shafi and haji mohammad sami, are the assessees in this case. they carry on business in the printing and sale of religious books at cawnpore and calcutta. on the 16th of july, 1932, an instrument of partnership was executed by the assessees, by which, according to them, they constituted a partnership in which they held equal shares. during the assessment year 1932-33 an application for registration of this alleged firm was made under section 26a of the income-tax act by the assessees. this application was granted and the firm was registered for that year. thereafter applications for renewal of registration were made year after year and the last renewal of certificate was effective until the end of the assessment year 1938-39. on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //