Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: allahabad Year: 1969 Page 7 of about 110 results (0.014 seconds)

Jan 03 1969 (HC)

Asharfi Lal Vs. Vaid Mohan Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-03-1969

Reported in : AIR1970All125

..... which a litigant engages a counsel for conducting his case before the rent control authorities would primarily depend upon the intention of the parties and the interpretation of the actual contract entered into by them. the tenant mohan lal indicated the terms of the authority of mr. ayyer by the vakalatnama. before the commissioner mr. ayyer on 20th may, 1960, filed ..... accommodation whenever he chooses to do so. the rights of the landlord and the tenant to put an end to a contract of tenancy by an agreement, remain unaffected by any provision of the act they can substitute, for an existing contract of tenancy, a fresh one. they can alter the subject-matter of the tenancy by reducing or enlarging the accommodation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

The Delhi and London Bank Limited Vs. Ram Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All497

..... 27th june 1884, was void by reason of the injunction of the 12th june 1884. for that proposition no authority is cited. it is contended that section 23 of the contract act applies, on the ground that the object of the mortgage was of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat a provision of law, that is, the injunction ..... . it appears to me that section 23 of the contract act does not apply to this case. it might apply if there were any provision of the law by which a mortgage under these circumstances would be void or illegal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Muhammad Allahdad Khan and anr. Vs. Muhammad Ismail Khan and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1888)ILR10All289

..... there is nothing on the record to show that any evidence was in fact excluded, not in the broad sense in which i use the word excluded, but in the contracted sense of exclusion by a rule or order of the judge. that proposition put so broadly, i am bound to say, i do not concur in. because with regard to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

T.H. Condon and A. Butterworth Vs. the Muir Mills Company, Limited of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All410

..... transferors and the transferees, the purchase money had been paid, and the transfer deeds in each case executed by both transferor and transferee. on a sale of shares the seller contracts to execute a valid transfer and to hand the same to the transferee. skinner v. city of london marine insurance co. (1885) 14 q.b.d. 882. he does not ..... contract that the company will register the transfer. london founders association v. clarke (1888) 20 q.b.d. 576. it is the duty of the transferee to get himself registered. paine .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

NaraIn Das and anr. Vs. Ram Saran Das

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All419

..... in which the government revenue was to be paid by the co-sharers of the village and by the muafidars. if it had been intended that the custom or the contract of pre-emption should apply to muafidars, nothing could have been easier than to add a few words to the wajib-ul-arz. nothing of the kind has been done .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Deojit Vs. Pitambar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1875)ILR1All275

1. this case differs widely from the one to which reference has been made martin v. pursram h.c.r. n.w.p. 1867 p. 124. if the debtors had described themselves as the owners of certain property and then gone on to pledge their rights and interests, it would have been reasonable to refer the indefinite expression to the description. in this case the debtors simply describe themselves as residents in a place and pledge 'kul haq haquk.' this case falls within the principle of the decision see e.g. ram baksh v. sookh deo h.c.r. n.w.p. 1869 p. 65 that a general hypothecation is too indefinite to be acted upon. under the contract act, section 29, an agreement is void if its meaning is not certain or capable of being made certain, and under section 93 of the evidence act, where the language of a deed is, on its face, ambiguous or defective, no evidence can be given to make it certain. the courts below have, however, found that the deed was not proved, and by this finding we are bound. our observations on the other issue are intended to impress upon money-lenders that distinctness in the description of property mortgaged is essential. the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Shib Lal Vs. Azmat-ullah and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All265

..... granting the relief contemplated by section 68 of act no. iv of 1883, plus the right to ask for the sale of the property in satisfaction of the debt as contracted for by the mortgage.' the latter portion of the sentence which we have quoted was probably not sufficiently explicit: it was not intended to suggest that a usufructuary mortgagee as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mahipal Kuar Vs. Sheoratan Kuar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All258

..... the mortgaged property, the mortgagor binds himself personally to pay the mortgage-money, and agrees, expressly or impliedly, that, in the event of his failing to pay according to his contract, the mortgagee shall have a right to cause the mortgaged property to be sold and the proceeds applied, so far as may be necessary, in payment of the mortgage-money .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Bhawani Prasad and anr. Vs. Ghulam Muhammad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All121

..... the village. the object of the legislature in enacting section 7 was to provide some sort of protection to proprietors of land whose rights were parted with either by private contract or auction sale. the legislature intended that such proprietors should not be cast on the world, but should still be left with some interest in the lands which they had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 1969 (HC)

Raghunath Swarup Mathur and ors. Vs. Har Swarup Mathur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-18-1969

Reported in : [1970]40CompCas282(All)

m.h. beg, j. 1. raghunath swarup mathur and his four sons are the petitioners before this court under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act). the petitioners fulfil the requirements of section 399 of the act for filing a petition under sections 397/398 of the act as they hold more than one-tenth of the paid up capital of the co-operative co. ltd., nawabganj, saharanpur, which is the company involved here. the petitioners allege that the first three opposite parties, har swarup mathur and kishan swarup mathur and jagroop swarup mathur, the real brothers of petitioner no. 1, control the affairs of the co-operative company and that the three opposite parties nos. 4 to 6--hari mohan mathur and r.p. mathur and k.k. bhartari--are mere puppets in their hands. m/s. shyam k. gupta company, auditors, opposite party no. 7, have been impleaded by the petitioners on the allegation that they have been colluding in concealing irregularities and frauds of opposite parties nos. 1 to 3. the central government, opposite party no. 9, is probably impleaded only because section 400 of the act requires a notice of such a petition to be sent to the central government. the real targets ofthe attack of the petitioners are the three opposite parties, who according to the petitioners, have functioned in various capacities contrary to the provisions of the act and realised salaries illegally from the company. the petitioners also allege that the three .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //