Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-15-2006
Reported in : (2007)(2)SLJ48CAT
1. since all these o.as. are similar in nature, they are being taken up together and are being decided by this common order. for the sake of convenience we are taking up o.a. 755/05, the first of all the three o.as., for detailed consideration and reasoning thereof will be applicable to all the three o.as.2. in o.a. 755/05 the applicant dr. sudarshan mondal has filed an application under section 19 of the a.t. act, 1985 claiming the following reliefs: (a) an order holding that the denial of promotion as chief medical officer (non-functional selection grade) and his supersession by his juniors in the matter of such promotion are wholly arbitrary and bad in law. (b) an order directing the respondents to review the dpc relating to promotions to the post of as chief medical officer (non-functional selection grade) made under dynamic assured career progression scheme in the year 2002 as well as in the year 2005 and to consider the case of the applicant for such promotion and to grant all consequential benefits to the applicant after giving such promotion, from the date when his immediate junior in the selection list were promoted i.e. with effect from 5.4.2002. (c) an order directing the respondents to consider the representations of the applicant by a speaking and reasoned order and further directing them not to make any further promotion till the disposal of the representations. (d) an order directing the respondents to produce/cause production of all documents/records relating .....Tag this Judgment!