Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: gujarat Year: 1969 Page 2 of about 13 results (0.025 seconds)

Jun 25 1969 (HC)

East India Co. Vs. Official Liquidator and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-25-1969

Reported in : (1970)GLR457

..... ? now, in order to answer this question, it is necessary first to appreciate the distinction between 'void' and 'voidable'. as pointed out by sir frederick pollock in his law of contracts, the words 'void' and 'voidable' are imprecise and apt to mislead and it is therefore all the more necessary that we should clear the ground by pointing out what exactly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1969 (HC)

Naniben D/O. Narsinh Vanmali Vs. Maganbhai Durlabhbhai and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-21-1969

Reported in : (1971)12GLR245

..... to which this act applies.section 106 of the transfer of property act provides for the notice of termination of a lease by providing that in the absence of a contract or local law or usage to the contrary, a lease of immoveable property for agricultural or manufacturing purposes shall be deemed to be lease from year to year, terminable, on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 17 1969 (HC)

Bai Bhanbai Mavji Vs. Kanbi Karshan Devraj and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-17-1969

Reported in : AIR1970Guj137; 1970CriLJ962; (1970)0GLR581

..... valid divorce had at all taken place between her and her previous husband kanji and, therefore, she had her previous husband living at the date when she contracted re-marriage with the opponent. in fact she does not refer to any such divorce between her and her previous husband kanji in her evidence in the ..... living at the time of marriage after the act came in force. if, therefore on the evidence it is found that at the time when she contracted re-marriage with the opponent, her previous husband kanji was alive and that she had not obtained any valid divorce from him, her marriage with the ..... ) and (v) of section 5. it is followed by section 12 which relates to voidable marriages. the contention is that at the time when the applicant contracted re-marriage with the opponent, her previous husband was alive, and if that were so, her marriage that took place with the opponent was null and void under ..... legally wedded wife of the opponent. in the case before us it is the reverse in the sense that the applicant had a living husband when she contracted re-marriage with the opponent. that question has, therefore, to be considered with a view to find out if she was the wife meaning the legally ..... husband alive and therefore, her alleged marriage with him was void. she cannot therefore, be said to be his lawfully married wife, even if she had contracted re-marriage with him. that was upheld by the court and consequently it was found in agreement with the trial court, that she was not entitled to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //