Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: gujarat Year: 1991 Page 3 of about 25 results (0.010 seconds)

Jan 10 1991 (HC)

Balvantrai Tulsidas and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jan-10-1991

Reported in : (1991)2GLR798

..... that the validating act is illegal inasmuch as it results in unjust enrichment. in support of this contention, the learned advocate referred to sections 70 and 72 of the indian contract act. as we have held that the payments were not made under a mistake of law, the question of unjust enrichment does not arise. therefore, this contention also has to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1991 (HC)

T.S. Rabari Vs. Government of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-05-1991

Reported in : (1991)2GLR1035

..... . some element of public employment is all that is necessary to take the employee beyond the reach of the rule which denies him access to a court to enforce a contract of employment and denies him the protection of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution. after all employment in the public sector has grown to vast dimensions and employees in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1991 (HC)

Rajput Anil Ramsinh and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-24-1991

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1146

b.s. kapadia, j.1. the present appeal is filed by the appellants rajput anil ramsinh and rajput jeetendra ramsinh who are convicted and sentenced by the learned addl. sessions judge, rajkot, in original sessions case no. 31 of 1985 as under:the accused nos. 1 and 2 are convicted for the offence under section 302 and also under section 302 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. for causing death of nanji puja. similarly, the accused nos. 1 and 2 are also convicted for the offence under section 304 part ii read with section 34 of i.p. for causing death of himanshu vyas. the accused nos. 1 and 2 are also convicted for the offences under section 324 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. for causing injuries to dhiru nanji. the accused nos. 1 and 2 are also convicted for the similar offences for causing injuries to bhanuben dhirubhai, amarshi mavji, laduben amarshi and kamlesh sonpal. they are also convicted for the offence under section 342 of i.p.c. for wrongful confinement of dhiru nanji. they are also convicted for the offence under section 457 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. for committing criminal trespass at night time by breaking open the door of amarshi mavji with intention to commit offence.for the offences under section 302 read with section 34 of i.p.c. they both are sentenced to life imprisonment. similarly they both are sentenced to undergo r.i. for 5 years for the offence under section 304 part ii read with section 34 of i.p.c. they both are sentenced to r.i. for six .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 1991 (HC)

Minor Anish Achyut Chinubhai Vs. Nanikram Sobhraj Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-02-1991

Reported in : (1992)2GLR1133

..... textiles and to sell the same for earning profits. by no stretch of imagination, it is possible to say that any right to run a running industry or factory was contracted out or leased out or farmed out to the lessee. the citation of the above authority, therefore, does not render any assistance to the learned advocate general in contending that ..... makes departure in the case of a lease for manufacturing purpose and also a lease for agricultural purpose and lays down that termination of such lease would, subject to the contract to the contrary, require six months' notice as opposed to 15 days' notice in the case of lease for other purposes. in the present case, we are not concerned with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1991 (HC)

Lalitaben Bhanabhai D/O. Bhanabhai Malabhai Vs. Lalitaben Bhanabhai W/ ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-22-1991

Reported in : (1991)2GLR1182; (1995)IIILLJ376Guj

m.b. shah, j. 1. being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and decree dated. 27th september, 1979 passed by the city civil court, ahmedabad, in civil suit no. 2289 of 1975, defendant no. 1 has filed this appeal. 2. plaintiff no. 1 has filed this suit for herself and on behalf of her minor sons, plaintiffs nos. 2 & 3, for partition of properties belonging to her husband bhanabhai malabhai against defendants nos. 1 to 3 who are the daughters of bhanabhai of his previous wife kankuben. it is her say that she married the deceased on 20th may, 1971 at village sanatal, district ahmedabad, after the death of the first wife of the deceased bhanabhai. the first wife of deceasedbhanabhai named kankuben expired in 1970. lalitaben, defendant no. 1, is a daughter of kankuben. defendant no. 2 shantaben and defendant no. 3 champaben are the other two daughters of kankuben. plaintiffs nos. 2 and 3 are the minor sons born out of wedlock of plaintiff no. 1 with deceased bhanabhai. the deceased bhanabhai was serving in calico mills at ahmedabad. he has expired on 2.2.1974, the deceased had not executed any will. the succession certificate ex.25 is obtained by defendant no. 1 lalitaben by filing civil miscellaneous application no. 280 of 1974 before the city civil court, ahmedabad. that application was filed for recovering following amounts: (1)amount of provident fund with the calico mills, ahmedabad.. rs. 15,000/-(2)amount of gratuity with the calico mills, ahmedabad.. rs. 8,000/-(3) .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //