Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: guwahati Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.027 seconds)

Jul 02 1991 (HC)

Noble Sales Agency Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-02-1991

..... a fair procedure, especially when the government considered all the tenders to be unsatisfactory, as already concluded. we have stated hereinbefore that even in the matter relating to state's contract with the private parties, fair play in action must be the basis of the policy. after giving the parties the opportunity to have their respective say, the government could proceed ..... the rate quoted by it. in ramana v. air port authority, air 1979 sc 1628, the supreme court has held that no one has any right to enter into a contract but all who offer tenders or quotations are entitled to equal treatment. therefore, the procedure adopted by the government, namely, making counteroffers to the respondent 4 only ignoring thepetitioner, which ..... were disqualified, the petitioner in particular, for the following reasons. from the records produced before us, we find that the secretaries to the government recommended the petitioner for granting the contract stating that the petitioner was suitable financially, or for making the offer to all the tenderers though the minister incharge ordered to issue licence to the respondent 4 at rs ..... consideration of the past and present experience of m/ s. national trading corporation (respondent 4), the government may like to consider their tender for acceptance at the rate reserved maximum contract rate of rs. 10.68 per lpl. thereafter, the government offered the respondent 4, the national trading corporation, at rs. 9.27 per lpl, the rate quoted by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1991 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd and anr. Vs. Usha Debi and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-08-1991

..... :the presumption against retrospective operation is strong in cases in which the statute, if operated retrospectively, would prejudicially affect vested rights or the illegality of the past transactions, or impair contracts, or impose new duty or attach new disability in respect of past transactions or consideration already passed. however, a statute is not properly called a retrospective statute because a part ..... held that the law which would apply for determining the quantum of damages was the one which has been in force on the date of accident, when the breach of contract was committed inasmuch as the cause of action arose on the date of accident and not the law that was in force on the date on which ..... contract was made.9. in the case of punjab tin supply : [1984]2scr894 of the decision, the hon'ble supreme court has held:all laws which affect substantive rights generally operate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1991 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Usha Debi and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-08-1991

..... : the presumption against retrospective operation is strong in cases in which the statute, if operated retrospectively, would prejudicially affect vested rights or the illegality of the past transactions, or impair contracts, or impose new duty or attach new disability in respect of past transactions or consideration already passed. however, a statute is not properly called a retrospective statute because a part ..... held that the law which would apply for determining the quantum of damages was the one which has been in force on the date of accident, when the breach of contract was committed inasmuch as the cause of action arose on the date of accident and not the law that was in force on the date on which ..... contract was made.9. in the case of punjab tin supply, air 1984 sc 871, in para 17 of the decision, the hon'ble supreme court has held: all laws which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1991 (HC)

State of Assam Vs. Pranesh Debnath and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-11-1991

..... vehicle that incase of any claim with respect to the vehicle concerned, the insurer shall discharge the liability of the owner under the terms of the policy. it is a contract between the parties. it was also observed 'it is not a universal guarantee for the vehicle whosoever becomes the owner'.36. i have considered the rival submissions and also the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 1991 (HC)

Peoples Union for Human Rights, Represented by P.K. JaIn and ors., Etc ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

r.k. manisana, j.1. in these four (4) writ petitions, namely civil rules nos. 2314, 2238 & 2415 of 1990, and civil rule no. 11 of 1991, the constitutional validity of the provisions of the armed forces (special powers) act, 1958 (act 28 of 1958) and the assam disturbed areas act, 1955 (act 19 of 1955) are challenged. the validity of the two acts were challenged earlier in this court under article 226 of the constitution. but the proceedings were transferred from the gauhati high court to the delhi high court by the supreme court. a division bench of the delhi high court has in indrajit barua v. state of assam reported in, air 1983 delhi 513, held that the two acts are valid except those relating to assam rifles under the assam act. while dealing with the above referred civil rules, a division bench of this court has referred the following two (2) questions formulated in the order of reference to a larger bench. hence they are before us.2. the. questions are:'1. whether the army authorities under the provisions of the armed forces special powers act, 1958 (act no. 28 of 1958) can arrest a citizen or an individual, male or female, without any invitation on the part of the police authority or without reference to police authorities of the state wherever and whenever the above act 28 of 1958 is enforced?2. whether the decision rendered by the delhi high court in indrajit barua v. state of assam (air 1983 delhi 513) has binding effect on the benches of this court?'3. the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1991 (HC)

Shri Sampatmall JaIn Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-06-1991

..... estimated value at present for execution of the works as a contractor is more than rs. 11 lacs. petitioner has stated that his presence is necessary for execution of the contract works. according to petitioner on 23-3-91 a serious fire broke out in the night in a locality of goalpara just opposite side of the petitioner's house. petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //