Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: jharkhand Page 11 of about 330 results (0.062 seconds)

Oct 07 2015 (HC)

Sll Sml Joint Venture Consortium Through Its Authorized Signatory Name ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... . but on examining the facts and circumstances of the present case and on opinion that none of the criteria has been satisfied justifying court's interference in the grant of contract in favour of the appellant ..... 9. the learned senior counsel for the petitioners next contended that since there was no format of bank guarantee given in the e tender ..... law, particularly when there has been no allegation of malice or ulterior motive and particularly when the court has not found any mala fides or favouritism in the grant of contract in favour of the appellant......... 10. therefore, though the principle of judicial review cannot be denied so far as exercise of contractual powers of government bodies are concerned, but it ..... the tender which has not specifically been provided in the tender document, may lead to arbitrariness. the contention that submission of bank guarantee is not an essential condition of the contract, is liable to be rejected. in central bank of india ltd., amritsar vs. hartford fire insurance co. ltd. air 1965 sc 1288, the hon'ble supreme court observed that, ..... (bengaluru) 560064 petitioners versus 1. central coalfields limited, through its chairman cum managing director, darbhanga house, p.o. court post office, p.s. kotwali, town ranchi 834001 2. general manager, contract management cell (cmc), central coalfields limited, darbhanga house, p.o. court post office, p.s. kotwali, town ranchi 834001 3. m/s mjunction services ltd., through its managing director, having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2017 (HC)

Jharkhand Van Dainik Vetan Bhogi Pashu Rakshak Karmachari Sangh Throug ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... stipulation finds mention in 2015 rules, which were notified vide notification dated 13.02.2015. the judgment in umadevi (3), in fact, refers to appointment on daily wages, casual basis, contract etc. the one time scheme envisaged under para 53 of the judgment in umadevi (3) covers the daily wagers who have been working for 10 or more years. another plea .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2017 (HC)

Narendra Pal Garg Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a.no. 168 of 2016 narendra pal garg ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i .... opposite party with a.b.a.no. 4601 of 2015 manoj gupta ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i .... opposite party --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh --------- for the petitioners : m/s indrajit sinha, chandrajit mukherjee, adv. for the c.b.i. : mr. k.p.deo, s.c. --------- c.a.v. on 19.07.2017 pronounced on 27/ 07/2017 both the applications are heard together and disposed of by this common order as both the cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.03(a)/2015-r, registered under section 420/468/471 of the ipc read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, cbi, acb ranchi got information from reliable source that one narendra pal garg, the then osd(project) and sri abhay nindakan tigga, the then electrical engineer, both of central university of jharkhand (cuj), brambe, ranchi, entered into a criminal conspiracy with ranjit kumar and other unknown during the period 2012-2013 and committed an offence of cheating and criminal misconduct and in pursuance thereof, the public servants as above, by abusing their official positions, caused a wrongful loss of rs.4,51,500.00 (approx) to the central university of jharkhand and corresponding wrongful gain to the above mentioned private firm, in the matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2017 (HC)

Manoj Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a.no. 168 of 2016 narendra pal garg ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i .... opposite party with a.b.a.no. 4601 of 2015 manoj gupta ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i .... opposite party --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh --------- for the petitioners : m/s indrajit sinha, chandrajit mukherjee, adv. for the c.b.i. : mr. k.p.deo, s.c. --------- c.a.v. on 19.07.2017 pronounced on 27/ 07/2017 both the applications are heard together and disposed of by this common order as both the cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.03(a)/2015-r, registered under section 420/468/471 of the ipc read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, cbi, acb ranchi got information from reliable source that one narendra pal garg, the then osd(project) and sri abhay nindakan tigga, the then electrical engineer, both of central university of jharkhand (cuj), brambe, ranchi, entered into a criminal conspiracy with ranjit kumar and other unknown during the period 2012-2013 and committed an offence of cheating and criminal misconduct and in pursuance thereof, the public servants as above, by abusing their official positions, caused a wrongful loss of rs.4,51,500.00 (approx) to the central university of jharkhand and corresponding wrongful gain to the above mentioned private firm, in the matter of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2017 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

..... techno commercial bid or price bid of offers under their custody. the petitioner just processed offers whenever given by to cell and did required execution only as per pcp (purchase & contract procedure) in vogue. that in the present f.i.r charge sheet has been submitted against 10 suppliers/trader firms and against 8 officers of sail out of which 5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2003 (HC)

Bachcha Prasad Pathak Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR55(Jhr)]

..... followed by initiation of proceeding, vide resolution dated 10th july, 2002.two allegations were leveled against the petitioner, namely, (i) he accepted n.s.c. as security money while granting contract in favour of one shri ram nagina tiwary, contractor without pledging it; and (ii) though the rate quoted by two tenderers; one local (shri ujjawal kumar sinha) and an outsider ..... pledged, which will be evident from the letter issued by the concerned bank. he rightly argued that no person can be denied contract merely on the ground that he is outsider. such charge itself is misconceived as otherwise grant of contract only to the local contractor is violative of article 14 of the constitution of india.7. in the circumstances, the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2007 (HC)

Tata MaIn Hospital Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR174(Jhr)]

..... than newspapers, where such sale or purchase takes place in the course of interstate trade or commerce. prior to 46th amendment of the constitution, composite contracts like work contracts, hire purchase contracts and catering contracts were not assessable as contracts for sale of goods. by 46th amendment of the constitution, article 336 (29-a) of the constitution was amended by inserting a definition of ..... being reproduced as under:45. of all the different kinds of composite transactions the drafters of the forty-sixth amendment chose three specific situations, a works, contract, a hire-purchase contract and a catering contract to bring them within the fiction of a deemed sale. of these three, the first and third involve a kind of service and sale at the ..... medicines, which are supplied to the indoor patients are administered in course of treatment to those patients in the tmh. therefore, it appears that the dominant nature test of contract is to provide medical services and in providing such medical services the medicines are administered, surgical items, x-ray plates and films are used, which are incidental to and ..... non-employee indoor patients by tmh are composite charge or package charge for rendering medical services to such non-employee indoor patients and such composite package charges are indivisible service contract. in rendering such services, the supply of medicines to the non-employee indoor patients at the cost price is incidental to and part of the services, which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2016 (HC)

Karmi Devi Vs. Central Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman

Court : Jharkhand

..... for refund/reimbursement of money against the state or instrumentality of the state by issuing a writ of mandamus are not to be entertained. in the present case, since the contract has been unjustly repudiated and having regard to the fact that group insurance of the workmen is a social welfare measure, direction is to be issued to the respondent insurance ..... . no. 347 of 2013 dated 28.04.2014, the limitation presented may not be a mandatory frame work.34. the other aspects that has been pointed out is that the contract was to give benefit to the employees and not only for the benefit of the employer. in order dated 28.4.2014 in l.p.a. no. 347 of 2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2017 (HC)

Jai Mata Di Enterprises Represented by Radha Kant Singh Vs. Bank of In ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... or as to any other question, claim, right, matter, or thing whatsoever, if any way arising, out of, or relating to the contract designs, drawings, specifications, estimates, instructions, orders, or these conditions or otherwise concerning the works, or the execution, or failure to execute the same, whether arising, during the progress of ..... code rules then in force the decision of the superintending engineer of the circle -3- for the time being shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all parties to the contract upon all questions, relating to the meaning of these specifications, designs, drawing, and instructions hereinbefore mentioned and as to the quality of workmanship, or materials used on the work, ..... material on record including the clauses quoted hereinabove. the prayer of the applicant for appointment of an arbitrator by invoking clause 24 and 25 of the general conditions of the contract read with clause 8 of the article of agreement, however appears to be misconceived. one may straightway refer to the judgment rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in ..... the workmanship or material used on the work or as to any other question, claim, right , matter or things whatsoever, in any way arising out of or relating to the contract designs, drawing , specifications, estimates, instructions, order of these conditions or otherwise concerning the works or the execution or failure to execute the same whether arising during the progress of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2009 (HC)

A.K. Sahay Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1994

..... person sought to be prosecuted must have allegation of contravention of the provisions of any rule made thereunder prohibiting, restricting or regulating the employment of contract labour, or any condition of license granted under the act, or any of the provisions of the act or any rule made thereunder for which ..... colliery every day, it is not also possible.5. 'principal employer' in the case of a mine has been defined under section 2(g) of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 as thus:2(g) 'principal employer' means .. (iii) in a mine, the owner or agent of the ..... of the said case. by the said order the learned magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences against the petitioner under sections 23/24 of the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 [hereinafter referred to as 'the said act'].2. the petitioner is the managing director of m/s bharat ..... offences under sections 23/24 of the said act against them.9. sections 23 & 24 of the contract labour (regulation & abolition) act, 1970 are reproduced herein below.23. contravention of provisions regarding employment of contract labour- whoever contravenes any provision of this act or of any rules made thereunder prohibiting, restricting or ..... regulating the employment of contract labour, or contravenes any condition of a licence granted under this act shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //