Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: jharkhand Year: 2015 Page 4 of about 46 results (0.011 seconds)

Feb 21 2015 (HC)

Anand Traders Through Its Proprietor Anand Kumar Vs. The State of Jhar ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-21-2015

..... india. the scheme under which the retail outlet dealership was awarded is intended at extending benefits to poorer and weaker section of the society and therefore, every breach of the contract cannot be taken as ground for cancelling the benefit extended to the awardee. as noticed above, there is no allegation of adulteration or any other serious irregularity committed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2015 (HC)

Smt Dipti Dey Vs. The Union of India Through General Manager South Eas ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-13-2015

..... fixation of license fee. thereafter, the petitioner filed representation before the railway authorities and without giving any heed to the representation of the petitioner, the petitioner was intimated that her contract has been terminated and she has been directed to vacate the catering unit, as per annexure 7 to the writ application. it has been averred in the writ application that ..... asked to deposit the same, which has been enhanced and determined without following the due process. petitioner has further prayed for quashing letter dated 19.11.2013 (annexure7) whereby the contract of the petitioner has been terminated and for 2 quashing of the formula for fixation of license fee for the catering units under the catering policy, 2010 issued vide commercial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2015 (HC)

Smt. Lilawati Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-06-2015

..... petitioner is with respect to breach of the terms and conditions of the agreement for which proper recourse for the complainant was to file a suit for specific performance of contract. the complainant instead of seeking appropriate remedy before the civil court has instituted the present complaint case and in absence of any criminal intent on the part of the petitioner ..... dishonest inducement on the part of the respondents and thereby the respondents parted with the property. it is trite law and common sense that an honest man entering into a contract is deemed to represent that he has the present intention of carrying it out but if, having accepted the pecuniary advantage involved in the transaction, he fails to pay his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2015 (HC)

Chandra Sekhar Banerjee and Anr Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-14-2015

..... the contractor has the capacity and the resources to successfully execute the work; and (e) if the state or its instrumentalities act reasonably, fairly and in public interest in awarding contract, here again, interference by court is very restrictive since no person can claim a fundamental right to carry on business with the government. 12. keeping in view the aforesaid ..... hand, sri indrajit sinha, learned counsel for the respondents submits that it is well settled that in the matter of formulating of condition of a tender document and awarding a contract, the greater latitude is required to be given to the state authority, unless the action of tendering authority is found to be malicious and misuse of its statutory power. ..... of bccl) floated by m/s bharat coking coal ltd., dhanbad (meant for the purpose of supply of mine slope stability monitoring radar with installation, commissioning and comprehensive annual maintenance contract (camc) for 5 years with spares & consumables after warranty period. qty-2 sets). wherein the technical specification only allows participation of real aperture radar (rar) and eliminates completely newer/ ..... such action of the executive as is proved to be arbitrary or unreasonable. if the government acts in conformity with certain healthy standards and norms such as awarding of contracts by inviting tenders, in those circumstances, the interference by courts is very limited; (c) in the matter of formulating conditions of a tender document and awarding a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2015 (HC)

Bhanu Prasad Singh and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-20-2015

..... of inducement which may be judged by his subsequent conduct but for this subsequent conduct is not the sole test. mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction, that is the time when the offence is ..... prasad verma v. state of bihar; (2000) 4 scc168the court while scanning the definition of cheating and breach of contract held as follows: in determining the question it has to be kept in mind that the distinction between mere breach of contract and the offence of cheating is a fine one. it depends upon the intention of the accused at the time .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2015 (HC)

Bipin Bihari Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secret ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-21-2015

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (s) no. 6243 of 2014 --- bipin bihari singh --- --- ---- petitioner versus 1. the state of jharkhand through the chief secretary,jharkhand 2. secretary, department of mines & geology --- --- --- respondents --- coram: the hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner: mr. delip jerath & mr. rajesh kumar, advocates for the respondent-state: mr. mohan kr. dubey, jc to ag --- 03/ 21.05.2015 heard counsel for the parties.2. petitioner in the present writ application, has approached this court for completion of the process of appointment to the post of director by way of promotion by considering his case as he is the senior most official in the directorate of mines and that the notification dated 25.10.2014 i.e. jharkhand mining engineering services rules, 2011 (as amended in 2014) be held as not applicable to the case of the petitioner for the purposes of promotion. the post of director is lying vacant and was being occupied in officiating capacity by the petitioner since 01.04.2008.3. as it appears from the submissions of the parties and certain relevant materials brought to the notice of the court, prior to the notification of 25.10.2014, the post of director was a part of the cadre structure, as per the 2011 rules also. the amended 2011 rules notified on 10.11.2014 however has restructured the cadre and the highest post in the jharkhand mining engineering services is the post of additional director (mines) which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2015 (HC)

Sll Sml Joint Venture Consortium Through Its Authorized Signatory Name ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Oct-07-2015

..... . but on examining the facts and circumstances of the present case and on opinion that none of the criteria has been satisfied justifying court's interference in the grant of contract in favour of the appellant ..... 9. the learned senior counsel for the petitioners next contended that since there was no format of bank guarantee given in the e tender ..... law, particularly when there has been no allegation of malice or ulterior motive and particularly when the court has not found any mala fides or favouritism in the grant of contract in favour of the appellant......... 10. therefore, though the principle of judicial review cannot be denied so far as exercise of contractual powers of government bodies are concerned, but it ..... the tender which has not specifically been provided in the tender document, may lead to arbitrariness. the contention that submission of bank guarantee is not an essential condition of the contract, is liable to be rejected. in central bank of india ltd., amritsar vs. hartford fire insurance co. ltd. air 1965 sc 1288, the hon'ble supreme court observed that, ..... (bengaluru) 560064 petitioners versus 1. central coalfields limited, through its chairman cum managing director, darbhanga house, p.o. court post office, p.s. kotwali, town ranchi 834001 2. general manager, contract management cell (cmc), central coalfields limited, darbhanga house, p.o. court post office, p.s. kotwali, town ranchi 834001 3. m/s mjunction services ltd., through its managing director, having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2015 (HC)

Hemant Madhusudan Nerurkar Alias H M Nerurkar Vs. The State of Jharkha ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-09-2015

..... ( form-10 a) overtime slip not provided to them, which is violative of rule 103a of the factories rule, 1950. the inspecting team further found that the contract labourers were not provided with leave book in form-15 of the factories rule, which is violative of rule 88 of -2- jharkhand factories rules, 1950. it is further alleged ..... growth shop of m/s tata steel limited on 14.09.2013 and in course of inspection, it was found that in fabrication yard no.1 about 100 numbers of contract labourers engaged. however, on inquiry, it came to the notice of the inspecting team that though the management took overtime service from them, but in terms of factories rule, 1950 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2015 (HC)

Rupam Bhaduri Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-09-2015

..... ( form-10 a) overtime slip not provided to them, which is violative of rule 103a of the factories rule, 1950. the inspecting team further found that the contract labourers were not provided with leave book in form-15 of the factories rule, which is violative of rule 88 of -2- jharkhand factories rules, 1950. it is further alleged ..... growth shop of m/s tata steel limited on 14.09.2013 and in course of inspection, it was found that in fabrication yard no.1 about 100 numbers of contract labourers engaged. however, on inquiry, it came to the notice of the inspecting team that though the management took overtime service from them, but in terms of factories rule, 1950 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2015 (HC)

Ms Hotel Rajasthan Through Its Proprietor Sri Mahabir Prasad Sharma Vs ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-25-2015

..... .2. the petitioner, a residential hotel established in the year, 1978, claims its registration under the shops and establishment act, 1953. it was granted electrical connection under nds2 mode and contract demand of 33 kw. on 07.07.2015 the electrical connection of the petitioner was disconnected on the allegation of theft of electricity. subsequently, a bill for rs. 6,60 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //