Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: kolkata Year: 1979 Page 3 of about 24 results (0.013 seconds)

Apr 20 1979 (HC)

Arrah Sasaram Light Railway Company Ltd. (In Voluntary Liquidation) an ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1979

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas326(Cal)

..... from the company through the joint liquidators for the value of rs. 95 lakhs. it is only at the point when the purchasers were removing the assets pursuant to the contract of purchase, the respondent, district board, rohtas, started criminal proceedings under section 144 (cr. pc) and thereafter, the suit has been filed and an order of injunction has been obtained ..... said joint liquidators to the said purchaser being respondent no. 2, technical steel & alloy company ltd. of 23a, netaji subhas road, calcutta, on the terms and conditions incorporated in the contract and the said purchaser thereafter paid the first instalment of rs. 12,00,000 and took steps to remove and lift the said goods purchased by them from the company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1979 (HC)

Debi Jhora Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Barendra Krishna Bhowmick and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-22-1979

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas771(Cal)

..... could be considered in terms of article 98 of the articles of the company. mr. senfurther submitted that the articles constituted a contract between shareholders and company and the shareholders and company can, if they so choose, vary the contract. in any event, the court had ample jurisdiction and power to override the statute in regard to the formalities of calling a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1979 (HC)

Jiban Roy Choudhury Vs. Sm. Taramoyee Debi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-20-1979

Reported in : AIR1979Cal339

..... mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the appellant, submitted firstly that the notice of ejectment was given by the two ladies as executors (wrongly described in place of administrator) whereas the contract of tenancy that was pleaded and established was by plaintiff no. 1 only. the decision in parekh brothers v. kartick chand, : air1968cal532 was referred to wherein it was held that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1979 (HC)

Mohan Lal Mittal and ors. Vs. Universal Wires Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-30-1979

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas36(Cal)

..... functions of subramanyam as the secretary of the corporation would be ministerial and administrative. as a secretary only, he would have no authority to bind the corporation by entering into contracts, or other commitments on its behalf.'21. it is true that the said decision is before the 1974 amendment in the definition of 'secretary' under section 2(45) of the ..... duties which must be, or usually are, discharged by a secretary are signing the annual return and certifying the documents annexed to it ; delivering for registration returns of allotments, and contracts for the allotment of shares paid up otherwise than in cash ; making the statutory declaration required before the commencement of business ; giving notice to any proposed director that his liability ..... ground of breach of warranty of authority. whereas it has formerly been held that he had no authority by virtue of his position to make representations to induce persons to contract with the company, his functions being ministerial only, his status has now greatly increased. he regularly makes representations on behalf of the company and enters into ..... contracts on its behalf which come within the day-to-day running of the company's business, he signs contracts connected with the administrative side of a company's affairs ; and all these matters are now within his ostensible authority. but .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //