Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: kolkata Year: 2006 Page 5 of about 47 results (0.017 seconds)

Jan 20 2006 (HC)

Raymond Ltd. (Jkft Division) Vs. H.V. Doshi and Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-20-2006

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN578

..... of the parties though sometimes letters in writing were issued indicating terms of renewal. after encashment of the first cheque when the accused persons did not fulfil the terms of contract, the o.p. complainant sent letter to the accused no.l company and its directors asking them to return the remaining four cheques. the letter dated 29.12.2000 was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Sat Paul Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

..... respondent demanded and obtained the said amount as illegal gratification to show an official favour to award work order to the complainant. it was found in evidence that the said contract was only under consideration and was not finally accepted. it was held by the supreme court that recovery of the amount would not lead to an irresistible conclusion that it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2006 (HC)

Bengal Bus Syndicate and ors., Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-2006

Reported in : AIR2006Cal232,(2006)2CALLT220(HC),2007(1)CHN33

..... transport authorities. sections 89 and 90 dealt with provisions for appeals and revision. sections 91, 92, 93 and 94 dealt with restrictions of hours of work of drivers, voidance of contracts restrictive of liability, requirement of obtaining licence by agent or canvasser, and bar on jurisdiction of civil courts respectively. hence all those sections have nothing to do with the question ..... power on any one to make rules for controlling road transport or transport vehicles.12. section 95 conferred power on the state government to make rules to regulate stage and contract carriages, and also the conduct of passengers in such vehicles. section 96 empowered the state government, conferring general as well as matter specific powers, to make rules for the purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2006 (HC)

Narayan Prasad Sen Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-12-2006

Reported in : (2007)1CALLT1(HC),2006(3)CHN621,2007CriLJ1

alok kumar basu, j.1. appellant narayan prasad sen was convicted under section 489b/511 and also under section 489c of the ipc in connection with shankar mukherjee, being suspicious of the movement and action of the appellant, reported the matter to the cbi authority and according to suggestion and advice of cbi officials, a trap was laid down on 22nd january, 1995 at 'gyan sweets' where the appellant was supposed to come along with counterfeit currency notes for exchange.2. on 22nd january, 1995 as per previous plan, cbi officials were present along with independent witnesses and appellant was apprehended within the shop along with 23 number of 500/- rupee currency notes and 57 number of 100/- rupee currency notes.3. on interrogation of appellant and without, getting any reasonable explanation from him over his possession of so many counterfeit currency notes, the boarding house at. sealdah where the appellant was staying temporarily was also searched and a rs. 100/- denomination note was seized. search was also made at the official quarter of the appellant at coachbehar fire service station and a 500/- rupee currency note was seized.4. cbi, on receipt of a regular complaint from shankar mukherjee and after seizure of counterfeit currency notes, started investigation and in course of investigation, obtained expert's report regarding the counterfeit notes and after being satisfied with a strong prima facie case about possession of counterfeit notes by the appellant and his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2006 (HC)

Arindam Basu and ors. Vs. Amal Kumar Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-2006

Reported in : AIR2006Cal295,2006(4)CHN813

..... with the obligations of an owner referred to in the motor vehicles act, there is no law prohibiting taking of possession by the financier in terms of the agreement, if contracted to by the hirer.18. we have already pointed out that this point has been settled long back by the supreme court in the decisions mentioned above and those decisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2006 (HC)

Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited Vs. Heinz India Private ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-27-2006

Reported in : 2007(2)CHN44

kalyan jyoti sengupta, j.1. the above motion has been taken out by the plaintiff for interlocutory relief against the defendants and each of them for appointment of the receiver for taking possession of the production master copy and the art works of the advertisement material lying with various television channels all across india including respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 and to keep the same in his safe custody until disposal of the suit; for an order of injunction restraining the respondents and each of them and their servants, agents and assigns from publishing by telecast or otherwise the advertisement referred to in paragraph 10 of the petition or any publicity similar thereto and in any from reflecting adversely on the plaintiff/petitioner's product 'horlicks' in any manner whatsoever; an order of injunction restraining the respondent no. 1 and its servants, agents and assigns from publishing any advertisement published in ananda bazar patrika in annexure 'e1' to the petition and from continuing to telecast or causing to be telecast any further advertisement/publicity similar to or substantially similar to the advertisement mentioned in paragraph 13 and annexure 'e' containing the composition of 'brand h' or any brand referring to 'h' directly or indirectly.2. the above interlocutory reliefs have been claimed for getting decree for perpetual injunction in a suit filed by the plaintiff in the same terms of the interlocutory reliefs and also a decree for special damage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2006 (HC)

Ram Prakash Dwivedi Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-07-2006

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT203(HC)

..... complainant was not an employee of the kendriya vidyalaya but was deployed there for security purpose through supreme security services having its office at siliguri. the said agency is having contract with the vidyalaya for providing security guards year to year -- subject to renewal. service of the complainant was terminated by his employer. a theft took place in the computer room .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //