Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: madhya pradesh Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.051 seconds)

Jan 27 2015 (HC)

Pratibha Kushram Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-2015

..... the said hostel. the fact that respondent no.5 was appointed as a hostel superintendent, is not disputed. even if such an appointment was on contract basis, it has to be treated as a substantive appointment. this fact is not disputed that the respondent no.5 though was appointed as a ..... 7. from the documents available on record, relied by the petitioner herself, it is clear that the respondent no.5 was substantially appointed on contract basis as a hostel superintendent. from the order passed by the commissioner it is clear that in a girls hostel only a lady superintendent is to ..... of the state government that in a girls hostel a lady teacher is to be posted as superintendent. though the respondent no.5 was appointed on contract as hostel superintendent, yet she was posted in a boys hostel. this posting was in violation of the policy of the state, therefore, when ..... the petitioner is not a regular incumbent holding the post of hostel superintendent. it is contended that the respondent no.5 though was appointed on contract basis but her appointment is specifically against the post of superintendent of the tribal hostel and, therefore, the petitioner cannot say that the respondent no. ..... misrepresentation, if it was at the material date false in substance and in fact. section 17 of the indian contract act, 1872 defines "fraud" as act committed by a party to a contract with intent to deceive another. from dictionary meaning or even otherwise fraud arises out of deliberate active role of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2015 (HC)

M/s Link Utsav Auto System Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of MP

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-2015

..... commissioner, gwalior. if defects/irregularities are noticed repeatedly or there are repeated complaints against the service provider, the transport commissioner shall have the right to terminate the contract and forfeit the performance security; ii. upon the service provider being knowingly or intentionally involved in distribution of duplicate high security registration plates without authority letter from ..... cause notice after supplying copies of the concerning documents, along with a direction to the authorities of the respondents to invoke and comply the clause-17 of the contract agreement regarding dispute resolution by allowing this petition. she also placed her reliance on the following reported decisions:- (i) branch manager, magma leasing and finance vs. ..... extended a liberty to approach the appropriate authority of the respondents, i.e. the principal secretary, transport department for amicable settlement under clause-17.1 of the contract agreement. pursuant to such liberty, the petitioner had already been approached to the alternate forum with its representation and now after rejecting its representation by the competent ..... this, an additional prayer for prohibition and restraining the respondents from taking any coercive/adverse step/action against the petitioner in deviation of the terms of the contract was also made. (12) subsequent to passing the aforesaid order and before approaching the petitioner to the authorities of the respondents under the aforesaid liberty to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2015 (HC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. M/s. Tirupati Buildcon (P) Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-2015

..... some error issued a corrigendum. the respondent-contractor having accepted the same and proceeded to complete the work based on such an understanding, the corrigendum also becomes part of the contract, it becomes a concluded agreement between the parties and taking note of the circumstances, the award has been passed granting escalation. we find no reasons to interfere into the matter ..... is binding on parties. in this corrigendum the employer has given the corrected clause 13.4 and deleted lower part of clause 13.4 became irrelevant. even otherwise, since the contract period was 14 months, it is clear that deletion of lower part of agreement was wrong and the executive engineer acting as `employer' has rightly issued corrigendum. the respondent could ..... period). he submits that the second portion of clause 13.4 which contemplates a provision for escalation in accordance with the formula contemplated in clause 47 was deleted in the contract in question and after deletion of the same, the executive engineer issued a corrigendum vide annexure a/2 and indicated that this is an error and therefore, it was said ..... under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, they are being disposed off by this common order. 2. respondent m/s tirupati buildcon pvt. ltd., was granted a contract for the purpose of widening of two lane roads strengthening over various portions of national highway no.78 on the basis of an agreement entered into between the parties. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2015 (HC)

Gaurav Chaturvedi and Others Vs. Girdhar Gopal Bajoria and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-05-2015

..... 288 (north eastern railway vs. tripple engg. works) and other cases on the point. it is taken note of that earlier the supreme court had taken a view that though contract between the parties must be adhered to, deviations therefrom in exceptional circumstances would be permissible. after considering the ace pineline and bharat battery mfg. co. (p) ltd reported in (2007 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2015 (HC)

Veerendra Singh Rajak Vs. Seema Rajak

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-2015

..... broken marriages. we must remember that this relief is granted by bringing about a profound alteration in the concept of a hindu marriage from that of a sacrament to a contract. by that alteration, law has definitely set its face against forcible perpetuation of the status of matrimony between unwilling partners. next, we must note that this six month's time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2015 (HC)

Pawan Arora Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-12-2015

..... number of stage carriages and impose conditions on stage carriage permits. section 49 dealt with contract carriage permits. sections 50, 51 and 52 dealt with procedure of rta in considering the application for contract carriage permit, power to restrict the number of contract carriage and impose conditions on contract carriage permits and application for private carrier's permit. section 53 provided procedure to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2015 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Mechmen 11-C, Bhopal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-10-2015

a.m. khanwilkar, cj. 1. these appeals are filed by the department qua single assessee regarding seven separate assessment years i.e. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, bearing i.t.a. nos.53, 48, 50, 54, 45, 44 and 56 of 2011 respectively. moreover, these appeals emanate from a common order passed by the income tax appellate tribunal, indore bench, at indore dated 29.12.2010. since common substantial questions of law have been framed in these appeals, the same were heard analogously and, therefore, are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. the respondent is a partnership firm carrying on the business of hi. tech heavy steel fabricators and manufacturer for last more than 25 years. it is stated that the respondent has been maintaining regular books of accounts, which were duly audited under section 44ab of the income tax act (hereinafter referred to as the it act). further, it had filed returns under section 139(1) of the it act regularly. a search was conducted against the partners of respondent firm under section 132(1) of the it act on 16.9.2005. a survey under section 133a was conducted at the business premises of the respondent firm and no papers were impounded during the course of that survey. however, the assessing officer [acit-1(2)] issued notice under section 153c on 22.3.2006, calling upon the respondent to file returns for the ays 2000-01 to 2005-06 within 30 days from the date of receipt of the said notice. the respondent filed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2015 (HC)

Farooq Mohammad Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2015

..... court will not shrink from overruling a decision, or series of decisions, which establish a doctrine plainly outside the statute and outside the common law, when no title and no contract will be shaken, no persons can complain, and no general course of dealing be altered by the remedy of a mistake."the same doctrine is thus explained in corpus juris ..... the courts being of co- ordinate jurisdiction, a decision which has been followed for a long period of time, and has been acted upon by persons in the formation of contracts or in the disposition of their property, or in the general conduct of affairs, or in legal procedure or in other, ways, will generally be followed by courts of higher .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //