Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: contract of indemnity contract Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1962 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.026 seconds)

May 01 1962 (HC)

Sardara Singh Narinjan Singh Vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Chandpur and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-01-1962

Reported in : AIR1963P& H217

..... rupar, consequently, referred the matter to the commissioner under the workmen's compensation act for determining the dispute about the right of the government to seek indemnity. according to m/s. mohinder singh gur-bachan singh the truck in question at the time of the accident, was working under the control and ..... was in the course of the ordinary business ortrade of the government and the government was,therefore, principally liable. as the state government had given the contract for doing the lining work to m/s. sardara singh niranjan singh andthe bajri was being brought for their work andthey are, therefore, liable to ..... m/s. sardara singh niranjan singh. if the truck was not under their exclusive control, then the supply of bajri was obviously made on a contract basis. it was up to m/s. sardara singh niranjan singh to arrange for the supply of the bajri, and instead of doing it themselves ..... to be the owners of the truck of the persons working the truck. it may be mentioned here that mohinder singh gurbachan singh had also the contract of lining the canal over a portion of the canal. mohinder singh gurbachan singh got (sic) notice issued to the government under (sic)civil procedure code, ..... facts giving rise to these firs-appeals from order may briefly be stated as follows: the work of lining of nangal hydel channel was given on contract basis to a number of contractors. certain portions of the canal were entrusted to each one of the various contractors. the portion between ed 157375 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1962 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Bakhshi Amrik Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-29-1962

Reported in : AIR1963P& H104

..... a personal nature. this matter was examined by kapur j., in dewan chand v. union of india, air 1951 punj 426. that was a case arising from a building contract. the contract had been rescinded and the services of the contractor had been dispensed with. the contractor applied for the issuance or a temporary injunction. in a considered judgment, in which ..... constitution. nothing is farther from actuality. it has never been the case of the plaintiff that he was being deprived of any constitutional rights. the- plaintiff has alleged breach of contract of employment and the terms and conditions of his service. there is no allusion, either express or by necessary implication, to breach of constitutional rights, either under article 311, ..... incapacity has been imputed. to determine whether article 311 applies, the penal consequences of the order have to be. proved. a termination in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment, or in terms of the conditions of service, as embodied in the relevant departmental rules applicable to the government servants, doss not constitute dismissal or removal.the learned ..... the general principles discussed above, a reference to the express provisions of the indian specific relief act will be of considerable help. section 21 of the specific relief act enumerate contracts which cannot be specifically enforced. mr. saiooja, learned counsel for the petitioner, has drawn my attention to parts (b) and (d) of this section, which are reproduced below --'21. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1962 (HC)

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Punjab and anr. Vs. Lakshmi Ratt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-02-1962

Reported in : AIR1962P& H507; (1962)IILLJ604P& H

..... wages', according to section 2(b), mean 'all emoluments which are earned by an employees while on duty or on leave with wages in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment and which are paid or payable in cash to him.' the argument, which found favour with grover, j., was that an employee is only a person who is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 1962 (HC)

Kunta Devi Vs. Siri Ram Kalu Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-26-1962

Reported in : AIR1963P& H235

..... is fraudulently brought about, and one of the contracting parties gives but an unwilling assent. in the case of persons of tender age the court will readily interfere to redress a wrong : but in the case of adults the ..... respondent and who, on his release after his conviction was set aside in appeal, never cohabited with her. according to eversley on domestic relations, 5th ed. p. 29, -- 'the marriage contract is the most important a man can enter into, and public policy requires that it shall be honestly entered into; the law therefore interfers where from dishonest motives a marriage ..... in this suit may protect, with which the defendant may be restrained from interfering, the preservation of the personal purity of the infant plaintiff, and her right and power to contract a valid marriage, are amongst the highest rights which a human being can possess; and it would be a matter deeply to be lamented if the court had no power .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1962 (HC)

Amrit Lal C. Shah Vs. Ram Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-07-1962

Reported in : AIR1962P& H325

..... cases in which it has been asserted that, while the relation of client and solicitors subsists in is full vigour, the latter shall derive no benefit to himself from the contracts, or bounty, or other negotiations of the former;.........the principle being that the legal adviser must establish that a gift was the free uninfluenced act of the client.'(vide para ..... trustee. the onus is on the attorney to prove his right to retain money against services rendered by him and it is he who has to prove the existence of contract, express or implied, entitling him to retain the money and to convert it to his own use by way of loan or otherwise. when it is established that money belonging .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1962 (HC)

Dr. Partap Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-04-1962

Reported in : AIR1963P& H298

..... the suspension of a government servant in accordance with the rules, as is the case of the petitioner, it does not amount to suspension of the contract and severance of the relationship of master and servant between the government and hemanta kumar bhattacharjee v. union of india, air 1958 cal ..... work, he will have to pay wages during the so-called period of suspension. where, however, there is power to suspend either in the contract of employment or in the statute or the rules framed thereunder, the suspension has the effect of temporarily suspending the relation of master and servant with ..... this contention is also without substance.24. on the question of suspension the further argument of the petitioner is that his suspension means suspension of contract of his service so that relation of master and servant between the government and him has gone with the result that the government has no ..... the rules are made subject to this power. a similar argument that rules subsequently introduced after the appointment of a government servant were no part of his contract of service with the government was rejected by p. b. mukharji, j. in anil nath de v. collector of central excise, air 1958 cal ..... longer any control over him. he also says that when the service contract period ended with his reaching the date of retirement, his suspended contract of service also came to an end. the first case to which he makes reference to support this argument is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1962 (HC)

Firm Adarsh Industrial Corporation Vs. Market Committee, Karnal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-29-1962

Reported in : AIR1962P& H426

..... collector under the provisions of the punjab land revenue act. it was asserted that the purchase of paddy was liable to payment of market fee at karnal as it was 'contracted for, bought, weighed and delivered within the jurisdiction of market committee of karnal'. it was also maintained by the defendant that the order levying market fee was an appellate order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1962 (HC)

Punjab Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-26-1962

Reported in : [1964]51ITR588(P& H)

..... drawn our attention to the last proviso in sub-section (1) of section 24. he contended that his case is covered by provisos (a) and (c). according to this proviso, contracts in respect of raw material and merchandise entered into by any person in the course of his manufacturing or merchanting business to guard against loss through future price fluctuations in ..... respect of stocks and shares entered into by a dealer or investor therein to guard against loss in his holdings of stocks and shares through price fluctuations; or(c) a contract entered into by a member of a forward market or a stock exchange in the course of any transaction in the nature of jobbing or arbitrage to guard against loss ..... for the purposes of this section, -(a) a contract in respect of raw materials or merchandise entered into by a person in the course of his manufacturing or merchanting business to guard against loss through future price fluctuations in ..... as to constitute a business, the business shall be deemed to be distinct and separate from any other business.explanation 2. - a speculative transaction means a transaction in which a contract for purchase and sale of commodity including stocks and shares is periodically or ultimately settled otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity or scrips :provided that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1962 (HC)

People's Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sardar Sardul Singh Caveeshar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-30-1962

Reported in : AIR1962P& H543

..... obligations of such a person. in other words, resort cannot be had to this provision for enforcing payments on account of promises or executory undertakings or for breach of a contract. claims of such a kind are not at part with 'money, property or documents in his hands.' the object of section 185 is protection and preservation of money, property or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1962 (HC)

Tarsema Textile Traders and anr. Vs. Tarlok Singh Sadhu Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-1962

Reported in : AIR1962P& H470

..... judge of the lahore high court after accepting the revision sent the case to the court below for determining whether the place of delivery was an essential part of the contract and also whether the payment of the price at jagraon was also one of the terms agreed upon. i do not think the reported decision is of much assistance because ..... instituted in january, 1961. in clause 9 of the plaint, it has been stated that since the orders were placed at amritsar, the goods were supplied from amritsar where the contract was made the original agreement was also accepted at amritsar, the amount was payable at amritsar and it was also agreed that amritsar courts would have the jurisdiction to try ..... as a matter of course. the real trial of the suit is to begin now when accounts are to be taken. as the contract was to be performed at karachi and the business done in pursuance of this contract was done at karachi with third parties, the proper place where the accounts can be taken is karachi. it is therefore, in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //